User talk:ConfidentFungus

This is ConfidentFungus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talon (series) (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talon (series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Talon (series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ConfidentFungus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 09:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lemba people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is what the article says and thus needs to be in the lead. Doug Weller talk 21:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ignore what the sources in the article say and delete a summary of that from the lead

if you read the section on DDNA. It's clear that the latest research doesn't claim a Cohen connection. If you have later research, take it to the talk page and ask that the lead be changed. Continually deleting something clearly sourced is a bad idea. Doug Weller talk 07:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Jibran1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Prince Louis of Cambridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jibran1998 (talk) 16:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Prince-Louis-christening.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Prince-Louis-christening.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jimmy Kimmel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Welch, West Virginia, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't me4an to do it. I'm sorry! ConfidentFungus (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bravelands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endorsement. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Thanks for contributing to the article Variolation. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Graham87 08:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube channels like SciShow are not reliable sources, especially in medical articles. In fact we prefer things like reputable books and peer-reviewed journal articles to videos in general. I apologise for referring to your edit as refspam in my edit summary, but adding Youtube videos (especially recent ones) to the lead sections of articles (which rarely require citations anyway) is never a good sign and is generally considered refbombing. Graham87 08:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! ConfidentFungus (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the SciShow video his a huge list of sources in it's description.

I didn't realise about the list of sources in the SciShow page ... but I've undone your edits again because you're adding sources where they're absolutely not needed, as I said above.. Honestly I don't recommend doing anything significant with medical articles unless you are yourself a doctor or have relevant expertise that comes from extensively reading sources from a reference library. Graham87 03:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Bravelands Characters

Hello, ConfidentFungus. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Bravelands Characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mirr Tribe

Hello, ConfidentFungus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mirr Tribe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mirr Tribe

Hello, ConfidentFungus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mirr Tribe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]