User talk:Computertheology

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Computertheology, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Computer Theology

An article that you have been involved in editing, Computer Theology, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Theology. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Computer Theology. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.~ Ningauble (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Computer Theology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Ningauble (talk) 03:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion

Please try to assume good faith. If other reviewers have offered only brief statements of opinion citing applicable policy, that is customary and appropriate in AfD. If I have offered further explanations on what these policies signify, it was not intended to argue the merits of the article, for the outcome of AfD does not seem to be in doubt. Rather, it was intended for your benefit because I have faith that the intelligence you display indicates an ability to learn the distinction between original research and encyclopedic coverage.

I recognize that this is a frustrating experience. Many contributors have submitted quite good original research, only to go away mad when it is rejected as unencyclopedic. I hope you will be one of the ones who stays, because you obviously have a valuable contribution to make. While every deleted article represents a missed opportunity, it is not a total loss if it serves as a learning experience.

Peace be with you. ~ Ningauble (talk) 13:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bertrand du Castel Beijing April 2002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bertrand du Castel Beijing April 2002.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Bertrand du Castel Beijing April 2002.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]