User talk:Commanderstephanus

Klingenschmitt

Commander S,

You need to look at the Klingenschmitt article. The guy is so full of himself that he wrote his own biography on wikipedia! His original article is so full of bogus crap, that it really needs to be deleted and completely re-written. Besides, he is a very poor writer. If his original article is any indication of the quality of his staff work--no wonder why he has been getting fired everywhere he goes.

USMC Padre 16:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination For Article Deletion

Gordon James Klingenschmitt

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Gordon James Klingenschmitt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. NavyChaps 04:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment

I appreciate your note. I suggest that you cannot prevent other people going wrong, and it may at this point be counter-productive to try. DGG 03:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Careful

I have noticed that you are being extremely rude in your comments on the article on Gordon James Klingenschmitt. This is unacceptable. I am not familiar with the details of Klingenschmitt's case, nor have I read the article (although I did skim it); it's clear you have an antipathy towards him, and I have no idea whether this is justified. But that doesn't matter.

Don't be rude. Don't be obscene. Make your point politely and intelligently.

And don't make fun of his name; that makes you seem like you're eight years old. DS 15:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on this a little, your last few edits in particular ([1], [2]) have been gross violations of Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks as well as against incivility. Worse, they appear to be part of a pattern. If you continue in that vein, you may well not get another warning before you're blocked. MastCell ^Talk 23:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]