User talk:CommCorr

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Based_Corrections. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halfway_house. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrections.

This user participates in
WikiProject Biography.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MisterMeth for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been falsely accused. I am one user. I have one account.CommCorr (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.CommCorr (talk)

Putting quotes into context

Do you understand the concept of context? For example, look at your recent edit on Ward Churchill. You stick in a quote from a juror without explaining who said it and why it's relevant. The fact that the preceding statement is about the amount of damages awarded by the jury does not make it clear that the following statement is by one of the jurors explaining why the amount they awarded was so low.

You seem to just insert sentences without thinking about what they mean in relation to the rest of the text. A similar example is your hysterical attack on Jezhotwells at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. A series of almost incoherent statements about his perfectly sensible edits on Rand Kannenberg. Incidentally if I was a registered editor I'd conduct the GA review on the Kannenberg article now and it would be instant fail. It reads like a (poor) résumé not following style guidleines for wikipedia articles. It's most definitely non neutral and the section on criticism is unintelligible.

Despite reading it more than once I'm still unclear about why Kannenberg is notable. So he lectures on drug rehab and he's been to all 50 states, big deal. I'd almost be tempted to suggest that it be deleted. 80.189.44.174 (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious about the edit on Churchill? If yes, please read it again. I was simply responding to another editor's request for a citation and did so. "On the following day, Churchill filed a lawsuit in state court claiming that the firing was retribution for expressing politically unpopular views.^[1] On April 1, 2009, a Colorado jury found that Churchill had been wrongly fired, but awarded only $1 in damages.^[2] Jurors stated that the damages should not be seen as "a slap in his face or anything like that" as Churchill's attorney had stated the case was about justice and not the money, "We took his word for that."^{[citation needed]} At the verdict, Churchill's counsel asked Judge Larry J. Naves of Denver District Court to order reinstatement in light of the verdict. + On the following day, Churchill filed a lawsuit in state court claiming that the firing was retribution for expressing politically unpopular views.^[3] On April 1, 2009, a Colorado jury found that Churchill had been wrongly fired, but awarded only $1 in damages.^[2] "It's just that David Lane kept saying this wasn't about the money, and in the end, we took his word for that."^[4]--CommCorr (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rand Kannenberg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rand Kannenberg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rand Kannenberg. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CertSociPrac for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, CommCorr! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^ "First amended complaint & jury demand" (PDF). Ward Churchill v. University of Colorado. 2007-07-25.
^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference wrongly was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "First amended complaint & jury demand" (PDF). Ward Churchill v. University of Colorado. 2007-07-25.
^ Juror Bethany Newill talks about the Ward Churchill trial. Michael Roberts. Denver Westword Blogs. Friday, Apr. 3 2009 @ 2:52PM. http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2009/04/juror_bethany_newill_talks_abo.php.

[1] "First amended complaint & jury demand" (PDF). Ward Churchill v. University of Colorado. 2007-07-25.

[wrongly-2] Cite error: The named reference wrongly was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[3] "First amended complaint & jury demand" (PDF). Ward Churchill v. University of Colorado. 2007-07-25.

[4] Juror Bethany Newill talks about the Ward Churchill trial. Michael Roberts. Denver Westword Blogs. Friday, Apr. 3 2009 @ 2:52PM. http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2009/04/juror_bethany_newill_talks_abo.php.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]