User talk:Comicfan72

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Comicfan72! I am ThinkBlue, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! FROM YOUR FRIEND: ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Marc Sumerak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Marc Sumerak is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Marc Sumerak saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. For reference, the prior deletion discussion occurred at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Sumerak, and the article as contributed today does not add anything over the version of the article discussed then. —C.Fred (talk) 01:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it was previously determined that the article did not meet the notability criteria for articles, particularly those relating to biographies. Since the article was recreated in similar form to the previous one, I deleted it under speedy deletion general criterion #4, which covers the recreation of previously deleted material.

I would have let the article stand if it cited independent reliable sources, e.g. a magazine article about Sumerak. In the absence of sources to verify the article, however, it is likely to be speedily deleted again. —C.Fred (talk) 01:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on where the articles are, yes. Time, Wired or the like—yes, the article would likely stand. However, if it's a blog or other less-reliable source, then no. —C.Fred (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]