User talk:Comfortkong

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at New York University, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. Mango person. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: User Teoipwa has like 20 edits, all adding puffery to Dartmouth College, or editwarring with Materialscientist [1], Esrever [2] and Corkythehornetfan [3], to add puffery to Dartmouth College. Before a plethora of IPs and Rochester3000 were editwarring at Dartmouth College to add puffery. See the article's Revision history. The fact that Rochester3000 and Teoipwa are making similar edits at NYU at about same time further proves they are same. BTW, I'm happy for you C:--Comfortkong (talk) 02:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corkythehornetfan suspected it longtime ago and left note about it on Talk:Dartmouth College [4]--Comfortkong (talk) 02:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the happiness. I wish you could play by the rules; we'd have a lot more fun. I thought of you yesterday at dinner, since we had mango chutney and I drank a mango-flavored beer. Drmies (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I know. I see so many socks vandalizing Wikipedia, but can't report them because I'm also a sockpuppet. Is it possible at this point in time? Maybe you can help me with this now that you are a CheckUser. I can play by the rules. Maybe a topic ban or several topic bans, and then a Checkuser, hopefully you, can keep an eye on me. If it's not possible, it's ok I understand, and thank you anyways.--Comfortkong (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that would be interesting, and I would be happy to discuss things with you. I don't know if you know this, but I love seeing the glass as half-full. You obviously know how to edit Wikipedia, so that's always a plus. But these rules--for instance, you know you had a habit of adding folks without Wikipedia articles to NYU articles, and that rubbed a bunch of people the wrong way, because it seemed like plugging. Can you commit, for instance, to not doing that again? Oh! I forgot--the day AFTER the mango chutney, we actually had one of those delicious little golden mangoes for breakfast. What are the odds??? Drmies (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so so much! I can't believe it's happening. I thought I was going to be a pariah on Wikipedia forever. I really really appreciate your help. I can commit to whatever you want me to do on Wikipedia, at any given moment. I promise. And yes, mango is the best tasting food on the planet.--Comfortkong (talk) 01:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, this is good to hear. Now, contrary to popular belief, I don't run Wikipedia all by myself, and I can't just do what I'd like to. You--if indeed you are who we all think you are--have quite a number of sockpuppets, and the first thing you'd get thrown at you is WP:Standard offer. That, of course, typically involves six months without socking. Acceding to that is the easiest, meaning least complicated, way back into the fold. Now, since you got a CU block also, one might suggest that an unblock via ArbCom is a possibility also, and that might involve topic restrictions--but I think that I'd want you to look at that offer first. Hey, take your time; we've been doing this dance long enough, so no need to hurry now, and this show on TV is about to get exciting. Later, Drmies (talk) 02:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready to stay off Wikipedia for six months, abide by all rules and regulations, and not create any more sockpuppets ever. Thank you so much for your assistance in this matter. I so greatly appreciate it. Through which account I'll edit when I return after six months (January 1st, 2018)? ~~I don't remember the password of Mangoeater1000 account.~~ Thanks again,--Comfortkong (talk) 03:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to recollect the password of Mangoeater1000 account, and if you allow, I'd love to edit through that account when I come back after six months.--Comfortkong (talk) 03:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK--this all sounds really good. I'll talk it over with some people, just to make sure. And something that occurred to me last night--this editor 72Dino, whom you pretty much chased off the project, you didn't treat him very well. I don't know what to do about that, but I thought I should let you know that some people got hurt along the way.

I see that you are not blocked from editing our talk page (on the Mangoeater account--if I read the log correctly) so that should be the proper way to discuss matters. Let me know if that works--you can ping me from here if I was wrong, or if you can't find the password after all. (If you had email set up you can retrieve it, I think.) Later, Drmies (talk) 13:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I felt a deep remorse for what accidentally happened to 72Dino. That was purely unintentional. He put his name and blog on Wikipedia when he created his account, if I recall correctly on both his userpage and sandbox, then after sometime removed them. When I saw that and called him by his real name, he immediately had that edit of mine, as well as the places where he put out his name, revdeled. Then he immediately retired. I still feel deep regret for the unintentional wrong committed. The good news is I think he's finally created another account after being an occasional IP editor for sometime. I maybe wrong.

I remembered the password of Mangoeater1000 account, and I will try to edit through that account, on the talkpage and ping you, when I come back after six months. I believe I can edit own talkpage through Mangoeater1000 account. If something is wrong, then I will post here and ping you. See you in 6 months! Thank you so much and best regards! I will forever be indebted to you--Comfortkong (talk) 13:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did it work? Mangoeater1000, I have not seen an edit or heard a ping from you. Sorry if I missed it. Drmies (talk) 02:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies It worked! The problem is that although I can log into Mangoeater1000 account, I immediately get logged out when I try to make an edit, even on own talkpage. I would like to edit through a new legit account when I come back.--Comfortkong (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm that's odd. Well, we can talk about that, but ordinarily any unblock request will have to be made from the original account. I'll get back to you later--gotta run. Drmies (talk) 21:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]