Instructor Comments No. 2

Well-written

Expand the number of inside Wikipedia References. This is easy to do.
You only cover the "old" history. Talk about how it is now a larger area that encompasses Beechwold and Clintonville.
Street Statistics are great, but make sure they're cited.
Again - I don't like City-Data. Pull this from the census.
Good info on the schools and Landmarks

Verifiable with no original research

Well cited - but don't use City-Data - its not reliable.

Broad in its coverage

Appropriately broad

Neutral

Good here.

Stable

No Comments.

Illustrated

No photos. Need those.

Kenitzer.1 (talk) 15:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Comments:[reply]

You need some more content here before I can really comment. There is a lot of information available on Clintonville, but you have to populate it in this space.
History section: you really need to take out non neutral language. Review Wikipedias standards.

Kenitzer.1 (talk) 20:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2nd draft

Notes from the class editor: good additions to the landmarks and residential sections. I would add more to the section about the Park of Roses, and I think that could actually be its own section within the landmarks section. I feel like you have a little too much detail about each of the schools, we don't really need to know the motto and mascot of every elementary school in the whole neighborhood. Also I think it's unnecessary to list the streets and bus lines that go through the neighborhood. Continue to add citations where they are needed. Clintonville has a lot of small businesses, maybe you could add a section about that and also a section about entertainment, there are lots of restaurants in Clintonville as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kowalski.118 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Class edit

Very good draft, except that there are no pictures which is important and necessary for the site. The Landmarks part looks very good but you need to add in tabs for Commercial, Geography, and Entertainment still. Also, you need to add in citations where noted in the sandbox. Overall it is looking good. - Amanda Giesige