User talk:Collegestud

A note

Collegestud, I don't know yet for sure if you are the same person as Gratans, though I have my suspicions. What I do know is that you seem to have, like that other editor, only one thing in mind: the partisan editing of Neumont University. I'm going to wait on the SPI to see what turns up; if that is negative, good for you, but you are still a partisan editor. You could prove me wrong but it would require you to edit more than just one article, in a neutral manner, and improve the encyclopedia. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 00:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Appreciate your support and assistance in fighting off the Neumont University spammers. Their school maintains an entire team of spammers with multiple Wikipedia accounts, so if they keep spamming your page or warning you with false accusations, don't fret too much and talk with the higher-up Wikipedia editors only. Gratans (talk) 05:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a higher-up editor, and I had never heard of Neumont until I saw the article. For the record. Drmies (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact me

Hi there - I am the Director, Community Advocacy for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that supports Wikipedia. It's very important that I talk to you - would you please email me at philippewikimedia.org at your earliest opportunity? Again, it's very important and urgent that I speak with you. Thank you. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 06:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collegestud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was wrongfully blocked.--Collegestud (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That doesn't appear to be the case. Have you contacted the Wikimedia Foundation, as advised above? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collegestud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of Gratans. Everybody is allowed to share his or her opinion. However, I shouldn't have supported Gratans--Collegestud (talk) 01:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We think you're a puppet of some kind, and unless you or someone else does more to convince us otherwise than you already have, you'll stay blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collegestud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I supported Gratans because I felt bad for him or her. But afterwards, he/she started attacking me also. His/Her smack-down was justified. I didn't do anything. I am a novice. I won't edit Neumont University article ever again. And I promise that I will never again support lone trolls. Unblock me and then adopt me. I need to learn a lot.--Collegestud (talk) 02:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you believe that a "smack-down" is ever justified, then you have no place editing an encyclopedia; period. You have a message from the Wikimedia Foundation above - you must contact them before submitting further requests (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.