User talk:Collardoscope

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Naturalmechanics! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:33, Sunday, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

J O Morgan

Thank you for this article. I note that you are a new editor, so I'll offer some helpful suggestions:

• You'll need more citations to verify some of the information presented. (I've marked which facts need citations.)
• As you move forward, you'll need to learn how to properly include inline citations. (I've corrected your article for now, but as you provide more citations, please do so properly. See Referencing for Beginners for pointers.)
• References without links are difficult to verify. As your references all appear to be relatively recent newspaper articles, it should be relatively easy to provide a URL for the article.
• External links without actual links are just pointless, so, again, please provide the URLs to go along with these links.

Good luck!

David Hayden (author)

David Hayden (born in Dublin) is an author and publisher based in Norwich, England. He has lived and worked in the US and Australia.

His writing has appeared in gorse, the Yellow Nib, the Moth, Stinging Fly, Spolia and the Warwick Review, and his poetry in PN Review. He was shortlisted for the 25th RTÉ Francis MacManus Short Story prize.

His debut collection, Darker With the Lights On (2017) was published in the U.K. by Little Island Press and by Transit Books in the United States. It was shortlisted for the 2017 Republic of Consciousness Prize.

The twenty short stories making up this debut collection have been widely praised. Eimear McBride said: 'It's an open secret that David Hayden is one of the most interesting short story writers around. Why it's taken this long for his first collection to be published is beyond me but I, along with anyone with even the vaguest interest in looking at modernism anew, will be queuing up for a copy.' Kevin Barry described the collection as 'quietly innovative, subtle of tone, full of feeling - this is a superb debut', and Sinéad Gleeson said his stories were 'equalled in invention by their lyrical depth and stunning concision. Sentences sing, startle and ask to be reread immediately. An extraordinary debut that will find readers keen to read more from this gifted writer.' <ref><ref>

File permission problem with File:Eimear McBride JMA Photography.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Eimear McBride JMA Photography.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Collardoscope! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:42, Tuesday, May 17, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rónán Hession (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rónán Hession and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rónán Hession, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Collardoscope! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Wrong place

You put content about David on your Talk page. The proper path is to develop a draft in your Sandbox, or use WP:YFA to create a draft. I recommend you cut/paste the content. David notMD (talk) 23:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Apologies - my first engagement with Wikipedia for some years and I seem to have forgotten everything I once knew. Will fix. Collardoscope (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Collardoscope! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Not a question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I noticed you didn't get a response to your other post. I'm not sure where the rule is, but we can only have one article about an individual. Your concern is valid, so you should follow the directions on WP:MOVE and start a discussion about what to call the one article. Consensus determines what the result will be.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rónán Hession

Hello, Collardoscope. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rónán Hession, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rónán Hession

Hello, Collardoscope. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rónán Hession".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Laura Hopkins

Laura Hopkins is a theatre designer and ceramacist. Collardoscope (talk) 16:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

And? Do you want to write an article about her? Do you have several independent reliable sources about her that discuss her in depth?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Marie Elisabeth Roche moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Marie Elisabeth Roche. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ae245 (talk) 08:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

• I'd noticed this too, but was going to leave it a little longer before draftifying, though it was over an hour since you had edited it so there was no indication you were planning to add any sources. You might want to rewrite the lead sentence: conventionally a Wikipedia biography starts "[Name] ([dates]) is/was a [nationality] [role]", where "role" is an indication of their area of Notability. Your article will have more chance of being approved in the draft review process if you explain, in the lead paragraph, why the encyclopedia should have an article about her. PamD 09:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

  Many thanks - am a bit of a novice at this abd will redraft along the lines you kindly suggest. All good wishes. Collardoscope (talk) 10:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

  I see you've tweaked it a little but still not got a lead sentence telling us why she's notable. PamD 13:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks again - working on it! Collardoscope (talk) 13:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

  The image is odd: you say "own work" and date it as 2024 but she died in 1971. "Own work" means "I took the photograph", not "I copied a photograph I own". Copyright in images is complicated, but something is amiss here.

  The article still needs rearranging, and it would be helpful to find a couple of references to reviews of her books, if it's as an author that you assert her to be notable. If it's as an artist, then find us articles about her work, or a note of what collections they are held in. Googling, I can find no indication that she was notable for anything except as Melvyn's wife, and "Notability is not inherited" so that would suggest a redirect to his article but not a full article on her. She has no article in fr.wiki, though is referred to as "a French Vicountess" somewhere. The combination of this and this suggests that she is a thinly-disguised character in Remember Me..., which might be worth a mention if sourced. PamD 14:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks again. Lise Roche wrote two novels in English which were reviewed very favourably in the TLS, Times and Guardian ('an unusually gifted writer'). These reviews were published on the dustwrapper of the American edition but are proving elusive. She's sadly overshadowed by her husband and as you'll know died young, and in tragic circumstances. I'm building a case, but it's proving a challenge. The image I used was with permission but not my own work and I've fixed that. She is indeed thinly-disguised in 'Remember Me' but the depiction strikes me as a self-serving travesty. Collardoscope (talk) 20:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Elisabeth Roche (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marie Elisabeth Roche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks you for your comments, which I have taken on board. Will revise, expand and resubmit. Collardoscope (talk) 15:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Marie-Elsa Bragg

Hi, apologies but I have reverted your changes to Marie-Elsa Bragg. I can see you were trying to improve the article, but Wikipedia cannot be used as a source - see WP:WINRS. You should not add external links; these should be added as references if you are using them to support statements. And you have tagged the image of Bragg as "own work", which suggests you know her, in which case you should not edit the article. Assuming you don't know her, please let me know if you would like any help formatting references etc. You can reply here and I'll see it. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for this heklpful reply - I'm still a bit of a novice. Although I did some Wiki editing some years ago I've forgotten much of what I thought I knew. I'll revisit, change the citations and amed the photo credit (it's a publisher's image I was told I could use). I'll get back to you. Collardoscope (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

When editing an existing article, please take care not to damage it. You removed several useful references, and also changed the referencing style. This one used the (unusual but perfectly acceptable) style of giving full references at the end rather than in the text, and you managed to disconnect a whole bunch of references which a later editor then removed as "unused". You left a large chunk of the article completely unreferenced, which is not acceptable for an article on a living person ("BLP" - biography of living persons). I think I've rescued everything now, but please take care another time. Thanks. PamD 14:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very muich for your help. I have no idea how I managed to mess up the references and citations and will review the current draft. I've been unable to workjmon the entry due to family commitments over the past few days. Collardoscope (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

The thing still missing is a reliable independent published source - or indeed any source - connecting Marie-Elsa to her maternal grandfather (who could well have an article on en.wiki if anyone was interested enough to create it, as rector of the Sorbonne during May 1968). I've linked him to his French article, but it doesn;'t mention his family. If you've got a published source, please add it. Thanks. PamD 14:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

My understanding is that Wiki pages are not regarded as a reliable independent published source! All I can find online about her grandfather is in Frnech (although that's not a problem) . Will work on this over the weekend. Thanks again. Collardoscope (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

If fr.wiki had mentioned his family I'd have expected to find a source for that statement, and tried to track down that source myself. Similarly, if you've got a source for her birth date, please add it - I've just reverted to the calculated date from her being 54 when quoted in a dated article, as the exact month was added by an IP editor with no source given. (I should have spotted that and reverted it, but my watchlist is absurdly long and I don't edit all day every day... just too much of too many days!) PamD 15:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

You have still not shown a source that supports Roche as her grandfather, nor one for her year of birth. Perhaps you "know" these things through personal contacts, in which case please read WP:COI and be aware that while "personal communication" is an acceptable reference in other places it is not so in Wikipedia. The only sourced info on her date of birth is that she was 54 when interviewed: her birthday might have been earlier or later in the year. Please do not add unsourced statements to any Wikipedia article, but especially not to one about a living person. Thanks. PamD 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you - and I know you're right about circumstantial evidence about (e.g.) date of birth. A problem is that some key sources which give such information, such as The Daily Mail, are (quite rightly) not seen as reliable or even legitimate. And while there is no question that Jean Roche was her grandfather it's proving difficult to find any source that confirms this. Her mother, the daughter of Jean Roche, was a critically-acclaimed novelist published on both sides of the Atlantic, yet was not the subject of any obituary in English or French. Collardoscope (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Could you find one source to show who her mother was, and another to show that her mother was JR'S daughter? Quotes from books? (If it gets to that, then add the actual quote to the ref, as most readers won't have access to the text). PamD 16:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)