User talk:Colineverest

Welcome!

Hello, Colineverest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Pyrusca (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI

I saw your edit to the Draft:sandbox. It will get cleared out soon enough so i put it in your sandbox

Pyrusca (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Noyes Maxwell (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThePlatypusofDoom was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just because she was married to someone notable, doesn't mean she is. Read WP:NOTINHERITED.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Colineverest, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Noyes Maxwell (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't know that you really establish how she's independently notable outside of the people she knew and her husband. She was a part of his life, but it could easily be argued that most of what she did was along with her husband and that Maxwell could be covered in her husband's article just as well. Her impact on his career doesn't automatically make her notable - you need to show where people have covered her specifically.

The claim of popularizing TPT is problematic because the New Yorker doesn't actually say that she was responsible for popularizing it. It says that she wrote a review and "then children readers instantly, mysteriously, took to it". It doesn't actually say that it was the review that made the work popular because they can't actually prove this. It might have been their review or it could have been multiple reviews as a whole that led to the work's popularity - or one of multiple other factors. You also shouldn't be using a primary source (since the NY printed the review) to back up this claim. The reason for this is that a primary source will be more likely to draw conclusions to related things and people if it will benefit them. It's reasonable and expected, but it doesn't really make them an unrelated and unbiased source.

The New York Times obituary isn't really useful either since it's more of an obituary than a written piece on her life. Most obituaries aren't usable, to be honest. The best way to see if something is usable obituary-wise is to see if there's a name attached. If there's not (ie, a journalist writing an article) then it's most likely not usable and might be heavily based on a press release or the obit written by the family.

In the end it's super difficult to establish notability for one spouse when the other is the far more notable of the two. For example, it was hard establishing notability for Stephen King's wife, Tabitha King as most of her coverage was just about her as the wife of a horror author. However notability for her was established by finding articles that spoke about her as more than just the "wife of" and reviews for her work. Sadly the spouses of notable people are typically overlooked by coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecily Mackworth has been accepted

Cecily Mackworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joe Roe (talk) 23:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Jeong-mi (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also remove reds from the references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Jeong-mi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 04:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Jeong-mi (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs all additional major independent news.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Jeong-mi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Noyes Maxwell (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not significant to satisfy the standards of significance and, as a painter herself, this would've needed museum collections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Emily Noyes Maxwell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kim Jeong-mi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kim Jeong-mi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kim Jeong-mi

Hello, Colineverest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Jeong-mi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 18:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]