User talk:Colibri1

Welcome!

Hello, Colibri1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 16:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Paisley (design), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Active Banana ( bananaphone 22:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sports cars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pontiac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sports cars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dodge Demon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sports cars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GMC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miniskirt

Hello, I'm just looking through your ongoing edits to Miniskirt - great work! However, I have concerns that some of your claims and edits so far (I am only in the 1960s section ATM) are basically WP:OR. For example, you claim that Yves Saint Laurent did a minidress in 1963, but your citation and quote are to a picture, not to a quotation explicitly saying that the picture looks like a minidress - even the quotation doesn't use the words mini or minidress/miniskirt anywhere, so it basically reads like you are saying "this looked like a minidress so I will say so in the article". I would avoid that kind of statement - try to stick only to paraphrasing what has been written in other people's authoritative words, not your own personal interpretation of pictures. From the sounds of it, the YSL design may be a tunic or an overblouse rather than a dress, and there is no shortage of images of similarly minidress-looking garments from the 1920s onwards worn as tunic tops/blouses/top halves of outfits that anyone could declare "looks like a minidress" about, so there's no real reason to single this particular picture out unless an authority has already done so in their published book/article/research - especially when there is already so much miniskirt research out there to draw on.

I do wonder - are you perhaps preparing the article up to submit it for a Good Article review? If so, I'm happy to help, although I've been respectfully sitting back and letting you work through it for the last while. :) Mabalu (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another friendly note - you seem to be using very large numbers of references to support some sentences and statements, including at least five in a row after a 9-word sentence, and it looks like some sentences have about 10-12 cites throughout them, like several cites after every single comma and then another big group at the end. This affects the readability of the article, and Wikipedia does caution against it - see WP:Citation overkill, so please consider rationalising the cites. Mabalu (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will avoid doing that in the future. Colibri1 (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also please avoid marking your edits as minor? A "minor" edit simply means you corrected a typo, added or removed a punctuation mistake, or did not change the meaning of the article in any way. Adding in entire paragraphs and sentences would not be considered minor edits, and reviewers sometimes filter out minor edits because they think they don't need checking. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Mabalu (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Colibri1 (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Colibri1! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]