User talk:ColdFeet

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 13:18, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Regarding links to Comixpedia

Hi, ColdFeet. I just wanted to clarify that I do not at all have a problem in general with linking to Comixpedia's site for information about webcomics. I'm a devout reader of quite a few comics, and I'm sure Comixpedia is a valuable resource for webcomic info, given that Wikipedia's standards for webcomic notability are quite high. However, the three links I reverted[1][2][3] serve no real purpose: One is blank[4], and the other two[5][6] are out-dated copies of Wikipedia articles and thus will not benefit the reader. Don't let that stop you from linking other articles to Comixpedia, but please make sure that the information on the other end of the link is actually helpful. —HorsePunchKid→龜 07:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC) reply[reply]

RfD nomination of Harry--potter

AfD nomination of The farside

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The farside. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The farside. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thinking in Java for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Thinking in Java, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinking in Java until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Comixpedia

Template:Comixpedia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm _Talk 05:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]