User talk:Colcourtfield
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mullets and Bars, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.raindance.co.uk/OLD_festival05/programme/documentary/mulletsandbars.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Seumas Next has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Henry the 9.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Henry the 9.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Henry the 9 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Mullets and Bars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Documentary that was shown once at "Raindance Film Festival" and never again, anywhere, in any forum, as far as I can tell. No non-trivial coverage in any independent reliable source--a bare few directory listings, primary sources, WP and its derivatives, and that's about it. The film festival's archive has plenty of clippings on its press page, including much coverage of other documentaries that were shown, but not even a bare mention of this film could I find there.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Iced Lolly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Web searches find only directory listings, primary sources, this WP page, and their derivatives. Some of the directories include regurgitated plot summaries, but I cannot find an actual external review at all, even in a blog or web forum. Cannot verify that it even had a premier, let alone any showings after that.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Seumas Next for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seumas Next is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seumas Next until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.