User talk:Colajmal

Hello

I am Colaj. Colajmal (talk) 07:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Hi Colajmal, Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I noticed that when you edited Chitral, you copied and pasted some text from the article Chitral District. While it's OK to do this, you need to provide attribution when copying within Wikipedia so that the original author can be determined. I've already done this for you, but in future you can provide attribution simply by linking to the original page in your edit summary (with double square brackets like a link in an article). See my edit in the history of the Chitral article for an example of how this is done. I did this using a dummy edit, but it's best (although not necessary) to link to it in the same edit that you added the text. Dendrite1 (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

What is this ? Please Explain it to me.

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria0333, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Faizan (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

What is this ? Please Explain it to me.

I see that you have twice posted messages above saying "What is this ? Please Explain it to me." It is difficult to know what explanation to give you, as you have not made it clear what you don't understand. However, I will try. The first one is a message explaining that you can't copy other editors' content without explaining that you are doing so. The second is a message telling you that you are suspected of being an editor who has used another account, which is blocked. If so, you are evading your block by using this account, which is unacceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know very well that what is this! Don't try to evade blocks Faizan (talk) 11:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Faizan Al-Badri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! your edit was not at proper place too! Secondly make sure about the spelling mistakes and other errors Faizan (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Mansehra, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say is that i do not exactly know what is all this; Please check my all contributions; They all are adding value and information to articles of those districts where people are not educated enough to improve their own district and city information on wiki pedia; Effort with a positive intent, if gone wrong for your procedures then sorry but I had spent a lot of my precious time on it and edited with best of my knowledge. There are two type of humans; one constructive while others non constructive. Knowledge sharing and knowledge enhancement is the objective of Constructive minds; I want my self to be proud of my constructive work. I had done that here but I think there is some thing wrong; You blocked me Sir bye Colajmal (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that your editing is so valuable, and that everyone who disagrees with you is "non constructive", then the thing to do is to request an unblock of your original account, not to ignore the block and keep creating new accounts to get round the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with James, instead of evading blocks, you ought to had waited for a week! Faizan (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]