User talk:Cojin

pics in character articles

i took out a lot of those pictures u added. its not because i'm necissarily against the idea of more, its just the location and what they were of. just so you know whats up, i moved the bunshichi in fighting mode one because it was in a random place. the only place that pic would fit logically is where he is referenced as the god of fighting and such. i took the souchiro one out cuz its just an extra image, not an actual part of the story, and two pics that close together clutters the page. i left the ones in shin's i just moved them to more appropriate places. i took the mitsuomi pics out as one is of him and maya meeting, and its a whole lot of white space for the most part. none the less good idea, i just think it deserves a better image. i'm gonna go get one of the two together probably on the motorcycle and such that has less white space. the other one i took out because the main image of mitsuomi is from that fight, two from the same fight is kind of pointless. now if you want to upload a new image of mitsuomi and then add that...cool. lets just be careful not to flood the pages with images either, i'm very pro-images but there is a point where its too much (not that we are anywhere near that point yet, i'm just saying don't go add like 50 images to one page lol). --Grimjaw 23:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i added some images to mitsuomi's...essentially what u already had, just images that have more to them than empty space. removed the original character pic so we could have a shin fight one without doubling up. check em out and see if thats cool with you, if not we can work something out so we agree on which pics to use and such. --Grimjaw 00:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i usually use manga images, its not necissarily that i prefer them its just a lot easier for me to crop a manga image i have on my hard drive than to pull up an episode and take a screen shot. if someone actually got animated i'd prefer to have at least one anime image of them on their page, i just never got around to a lot of people. --Grimjaw 17:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

maybe on the list of characters page but i dont think we know enough about them to right their own articles or anything like that.--Grimjaw 16:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nah man i just skimmed all the parts they show up in, in the manga. they never say the rest of their names. --Grimjaw 01:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dude when i first looked it up on here, there was the main article tenjho tenge, that had all of nothing on it...much like now. some of the coolest characters in anime are in this series and not one had an article. i created a maybe 5, and it stayed that way for a long time. i decided to take the time to do all i could for this series this semester. if u could see the difference from just january to now...it's ridiculous. the number of articles has skyrocketed and the format is completely changed. i only have 3 classes this semester so i'm incredibly bored and went crazy on the article creation lol. luckily duane was around to catch the stuff i miss, or fuck up. --Grimjaw 04:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dumb it down a shade lol...what do u mean? --Grimjaw 22:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see i would but a lot of the people on here are fags who piss and moan about everything. look at bleach, dudes delete articles for any dead character. so shin, one of the main focuses of the series is on his life, those fags would delete the article and such cuz he's dead. the only reason i haven't already make an article for anything and everything tenjou tenge is cuz i don't wanna deal with all the faggotry. making a site just for it would be cool but me and computer script don't get along lol. --Grimjaw 22:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah thats the way i was too, i hated souichiro and most of the present characters for awhile actually. once u read the manga tho and it gets deeper into the story the present actually gets really good. i like the present more than the past now. --Grimjaw 00:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the proper tags on the images that you uploaded. You cannot claim public domain on images from the Tenjho Tenge anime. (Duane543 16:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

not in regards to tenjho tenge no, dying for ch. 104...wanna know what happens to asshat. that little perverted bastard has started to grow on me, only tenjho tenge can make a character named asshat cool lol. --Grimjaw 02:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah after his return, with that hilarious popsicle scene he became totally awesome. although im getting his ass handed to him after the "pretty boy flash" was fucking hilarious too. --Grimjaw 05:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually he said he couldn't cry even tho he wanted to or somethin like that. click here. i have no idea why it was cut, it may have just been a time constraint or something. it really wasn't all that important so its not a big deal. --Grimjaw 22:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no problem man, i love talking about this shit (hence why i do shit here in the first place) so i'm glad to do it. some people around here are just asshats, don't let em get u down man. --Grimjaw 04:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:A young Mitsuomi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A young Mitsuomi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Double Impact!!.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Double Impact!!.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sohaku.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sohaku.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenjho Tenge

Cojin, Can you help out with making sort summaries for the List of Tenjho Tenge episodes article and the OVA (if you have seen it)? I have not really watched it and their is very little to non of individual episodes summaries on the net. It would be a big help!! (Duane543 00:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1192154002592.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:1192154002592.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cloverfield

Sorry to inform you, but the image you added for Cloverfield is just fan art. It's not appropriate to include in the article, no matter how cool it looks. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is where it originated. Does look cool, yeah? Hopefully the film's actual monster looks similarly cool. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible. I'm not crazy about these viral websites, as there's no clear indication of their relation to the film. My guess is that the blog artist saw what you've seen and drew his inspiration from that. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, honestly. That's why the links are not explicitly included at Cloverfield -- one has to play amateur investigator to understand how these websites are barely connected to the film. Considering that Slusho was advertised on the TV show Heroes not too long ago, websites like the Slusho one really don't seem explicitly based on the film. I guess we'll find out in January. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mitsuomi and Mana.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitsuomi and Mana.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cojin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cojin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oroso (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DSC02111.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:DSC02111.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Brilliant Pebble (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cojin

A tag has been placed on Cojin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 05:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes

Please stop recreating hoax pages, as you did with Cojin, because no matter how funny they are they waste other editors' time. Brilliant Pebble (talk) 05:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cojin 2

A tag has been placed on Cojin 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC02111.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC02111.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Brilliant Pebble (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Cojin, you will be blocked from editing. also Cojin 2. see WP:hoax, repeated inappropriate humor can be considered vandalism, and conflict of interest. – Zedla (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cojin.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cojin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fu chiens prosthetics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fu chiens prosthetics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mana in anime.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mana in anime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fu chien shocks shin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fu chien shocks shin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Souichiro's mom.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Souichiro's mom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]