User talk:Coiler fan

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Jessica flores, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dina 16:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Alfred Mendez, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dina 16:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pokémon (461-480)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Pokémon (461-480). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Theunicyclegirl 01:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a forum

Well, there are two things. One is that Wikipedia is not a forum. If it were, you'd be perfectly allowed to make an edit such as you did. However your edit was nonconstructive. Please read Wikipedia:Five pillars. Also, your edit was so profane that even if the content were constructive, it would have been reverted because it constitutes as vandalism. In WP:Vandalism one of the types of vandalism is:

Silly vandalism Adding profanity, graffiti, random characters, or other nonsense to pages; creating nonsensical and obviously non-encyclopedic pages, etc. Please note that the addition of random characters to pages is a common way that new users test edit and may not be intentionally malicious.

--Theunicyclegirl 01:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't tell people where I'm from. I doubt you'd know me by a message I post, also. And one thing. To sign your name, type ~~~~. It'll automatically post your username and the time and date you posted. For example: --Theunicyclegirl 16:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chrismigliore.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Chrismigliore.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following images have the same issue as the above:

Replaceable fair use Image:Lacuna10.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lacuna10.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Marilyn Manson band.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Marilyn Manson band.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ilse @ 15:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bionic (Christina Aguilera album)

Why did you remove the single and say it needs source? The fact that it was released to rhythmic radio stations is self-explanatory that it is an a single, and the impacting date is the release date. Also check sources on Woohoo's page, if you need further verification. Candyo32 (talk) 01:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an official single. Her label nor Christina herself have confirmed this. In fact, there was a poll not too long ago for fans to choose the next single. Coiler fan (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But the song was released to rhythmic radio, making it a single. Just because she and her label do not make an announcement doesn't mean a song is not a single. Simple album tracks aren't sent to formats, only singles were, and Woohoo was selected to go to rhythmic as the second single. There are songs that have just been released to iTunes as promo singles, and they aren't considered singles. But due to radio, Woohoo does not fall under this category, and is an official single.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Candyo32 (talk) 18:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

its about to get deleted. You Lost Me is the second single. And if radio play proves that a song is a single, than there is a load of editing to do on wikipedia. Woohoo was not an official single. Period. Coiler fan (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:800px-Cowboys & Aliens Comic-Con Panel.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:800px-Cowboys & Aliens Comic-Con Panel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]