User talk:CodyCruickshank

File:2015 NRL Logo.jpg.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2015 NRL Logo.jpg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 NRL Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2015 NRL Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2015 Indigenous All Stars logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2015 Indigenous All Stars logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2015 NRL All Stars logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2015 NRL All Stars logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in European current templates

Hello there, I have been asked by another member of WPRL to widen the conversation on "Flags in European current templates", in the hope to gain a wider consensus. I imagine that this message may well never be read, dismissed, see me lose support, potentially gain some or take the discussion forwards. Please do take the time to read the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_league#Flags_in_squad_templates if you can. I'm quite happy to voted down, but would appreciate a few more voices to the discussion, else it would seem quite wrong to move from the majority into the minority.Fleets (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw ^talk 13:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

CodyCruickshank (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "CodyCruickshank". The reason given for CodyCruickshank's block is: "Edit warring".

Blocking administrator: Mkdw (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are blocked directly. MER-C 06:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wrongfully and falsely banned for 'technically incorrect' edits on the 2017 NRL season page. The reasoning for the unjust ban is petty and the edits I've been making don't even begin to resemble vandalism which would be a proper reason for handing out a ban.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring, something which you have not addressed. Those personal attacks and battleground behavior in your edit summaries don't help your cause. MER-C 06:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw ^talk 06:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You are prohibited from removing unblock requests while still blocked as per the unblock instructions. Failure to acknowledge and abide by these instructions has resulted in an indefinite block. You will need to read and understand our policies regarding edit warring and WP:UNBLOCK before you may return to editing. I encourage you to read the Guide to Appealing Blocks before making any further appeals. Further failure to comply with our rules and policies may result in your talk page access being revoked. Mkdw ^talk 06:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah nah you're not going to ignore and decline my unblock request. I won't stop re-appealing this until the ban lift is granted. CodyCruickshank (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Good luck with that. TP access revoked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

sock puppet

The user edits now as IP 122.148.253.11.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 09:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full report filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CodyCruickshank. Mkdw ^talk 05:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20051 was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 00:58:46. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20052 was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 01:26:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CodyCruickshank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20053 was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 01:57:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Manly Warringah Sea Eagles 70th Anniversary logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Manly Warringah Sea Eagles 70th Anniversary logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 NRL Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2015 NRL Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 NRL Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2015 NRL Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 NRL Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2015 NRL Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61307

is open, if any admin has more to say. Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Consensus at UTRS 61307-- Can not or will not address edit warring and personal attacks. Block evasion in July. De facto CBANned.. Six month UTRS ban. Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(There has been IP block evasion not mentioned at the SPI, which I will not disclose on wiki.) Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jumped the gun

carried over from META:User talk:Deepfriedokra That is utter nonsense. You have been told repeatedly to address the edit warring and personal attacks. That means describing what to do in a WP:content dispute. The answer does not involve edit warring and personal attacks. You have spent the last five years justifying your actions and trying to convince others that your edits were fantastic and wonderful. It does not matter how wonderful you think your edits are. Every edit warrior thinks they are right. Edit warring is wrong no matter how right you think you are. You could have addressed these problems five years ago' instead of evading your block and showing the same "when I'm right, and nothing else matters" attitude. I explained all this in the last UTRS decline-- where you kept trying to justify your actions, including the edit warring.

As you've connected this account with this IP on Wikipedia and on Meta, I can post this here. This quote tells me who you really are and what your attitude really is. "And the actual fact remains that you can't and won't get rid of me. So take as many smug pot shots at me as you like. Hypocrite, "

By the way, you did not owe me an apology, you have not injured me in the slightest. Maybe C. Fred, but not me. Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]