User talk:CodyBenjaminMoore

This account is a sockpuppet of Codyfinke (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Noodle Kidoodle

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Noodle Kidoodle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/noodle-kidoodle.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noodle Kidoodle

A tag has been placed on Noodle Kidoodle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't Noodle Kidoodle a store that sold educational toys? If I were you, read this warning: "This Product Contains Olestra. Olestra may cause abdominal cramping and loose stools. Olestra inhibits the absorption of some vitamins and other nutrients. Vitamins A, D, E, and K have been added." Tell me, VWBot!

Proposed deletion of Photogenic Memory

The article Photogenic Memory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced and not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Photogenic Memory for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Photogenic Memory, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photogenic Memory until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nick Jr., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nick Jr. was changed by CodyBenjaminMoore (u) (t) deleting 28312 characters on 2010-10-22T20:57:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fakes

But you put fake things in the Nick Jr. article.

R.I.P. Charlie O'Donnell

Did you know Wheel of Fortune announcer Charlie O'Donnell died? I wonder who would be the next announcer!

Noodle Kidoodle

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Noodle Kidoodle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/noodle-kidoodle.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I remove the tag

I removed the tag from the Noodle Kidoodle article, and use your Noggin that the tag or any other tag should not be added.

I also removed the tag from the Zany Brainy article as well.

In addition, I added Greenman Brothers to be redirected to Noodle Kidoodle so it won't be removed.

Speedy deletion nomination of Noodle Kidoodle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Noodle Kidoodle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on!

I now added a {{hangon}} in the article.

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeopardy! Ultimate Tournament of Champions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not remove AFD tags. If you feel this article should not be deleted, participate in the discussion instead of vandalizing the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Winning Lines (U.S. game show), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do not remove tags as you did in this edit. Sottolacqua (talk) 13:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noodle Kidoodle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Noodle Kidoodle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noodle Kidoodle for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Noodle Kidoodle, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noodle Kidoodle until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judy/Instructo

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Judy/Instructo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cap Candy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cap Candy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cap Candy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cap Candy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 23:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cap Candy

Cap Candy was a division of Hasbro that was acquired by the Frankford Candy & Chocolate Company. In an attempt not to remove the page, I added a "hangon".

Speedy deletion nomination of Cap Candy

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Cap Candy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.

Noodle Kidoodle

Hey, I took those links out again, we don't usually link to non-reliable sources for random pictures like that. However, we do need a logo on the article, which can be uploaded for fair use purposes. Just look at how its done for KB_Toys including the non-free use rationale and follow that example. If you could handle that, it would be awesome.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 21:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't put a logo on the article

I don't know how to upload the Noodle Kidoodle logo in the Noodle Kidoodle article. Can you upload the Noodle Kidoodle logo on the article?

Peanut Butter (song)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peanut Butter (song), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.makingmusicfun.net/htm/f_mmf_music_library_songbook/the_peanut_butter_song_lyrics.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed notice on the Peanut Butter (song) article

I discussed on the talk page of the Peanut Butter (song) article, now I removed the tag...

Speedy deletion nomination of Peanut Butter (song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peanut Butter (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. noq (talk) 13:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hang On! Part Deux!

I added the "hangon" on the Peanut Butter article. I don't wanna be sock puppeted.

February 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to United Parcel Service. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of If I Wanted To

The article If I Wanted To has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion this song meets WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed notice

I now removed the proposed deletion notice, which prevents it from removing it and my account being sockpuppeted.

Added images to infoboxes

I now added images to the infoboxes to both the Noodle Kidoodle and Zany Brainy articles, so that the real image can be seen on these articles sooner.

Album infobox chronology

Hello, just to let you know that I've undone two of your edits — those to Surfacing (album) and Afterglow (Sarah McLachlan album) — because per the instructions at Template:Infobox Album, for articles about studio albums, we only include other studio albums in the infobox chronology (not live albums or remix albums, for example). --Beloved Freak 21:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redwood Curtain (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Redwood Curtain (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114252.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed!

I removed the external link as well as added categories to the Redwood Curtain (film) article so I won't be a sockpuppet. Therefore, I now removed the notice.

March 2011

Your additions to Redwood Curtain (film), The Piano Lesson (film), A Place for Annie and Journey (1995 film) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Movie plots may not be copied from other sources. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Redwood Curtain (film)

The article Redwood Curtain (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable TV movie, fails WP:NOTFILM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Notice! Part Deux

I removed the notice to the article, so I won't be a sockpuppet.

Nomination of Redwood Curtain (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redwood Curtain (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Curtain (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Piano Lesson (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Piano Lesson (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Piano Lesson (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Fields Price Is Right succession box

Rich was replaced as announcer by the rotating guest announcers. The rotating guest announcers were replaced by George Gray. The "after" succession box is supposed to be the immediate successor, not the current holder of the job. JTRH (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized I'm on record on another page arguing that "rotating guest announcers" don't belong in succession boxes, so never mind the comment above. Sorry. JTRH (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Huffman Koos

The article Huffman Koos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It isn't clear how this organization meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, and I wasn't able to find any independent, reliable sources I could use to improve the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kids for Character for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kids for Character is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids for Character until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 16:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]