User talk:Codu

All the comments on this page had become redundant. So I got rid of them, and am holding my breath looking forward to some new ones! -- Codu^talk 15:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above signature was fun, but I have decided to change to the following one, for a change. codu (^t/^c) 15:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed again. Codu ^(t)⁄_(c) • 16:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In-universe

Please don't remove the {{in-universe}} template from articles. This is a clean-up tag used to improve the article by alerting readers and editors to an issue and pointing themselves to a guideline that they can use to correct this. This process will improve the article and make it much better. Articles that mostly consist of plot summary are in danger of violating Wikipedia policy (WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information): "Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic."

You might also want to look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction), which is the guideline that the template points to. If you still have questions you might want to bring the matter up on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). -- Ned Scott 00:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Litvinenko

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:A Litvinenko.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Leather_is^tough 21:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Litvinenko photo date?

Hi, do you happen to know when the image Image:A Litvinenko.jpg was taken and where it can be downloaded? Thanks and cheers, AxelBoldt 23:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, do you also know from where the picture was downloaded? AxelBoldt 18:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noticing such information omitted, I've given the photographer (and press agency) due credit. —Leather_is^tough 21:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words

Thanks, I appreciate the kind words! I really enjoy editing, as well, and I am lately getting braver about talking in discussions . . . Riverbend 23:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Personally, I love the way your signature looks. Unfortunately, it does not conform to Wikipedia's signature policy, regarding it's length. Please consider shortening it. —Mets501 (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Mets. Your signature is too long – 746 characters long. -- tariqabjotu 16:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Msnmessenger-logonscreen-xp.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Msnmessenger-logonscreen-xp.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Musical Instruments

You recently expressed interest in forming Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Instruments. At this critical time for the project we will need as much help as possible. If you are interested in joining please drop by. akuyume^T_C 04:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you continued interest, if you wish, add yourself to the participant list. Most importantly, just keep an eye on our todo list. Feel free to add what you find to our todo list as well. akuyume^T_C 02:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:A Litvinenko.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Litvinenko.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lost Juliet some of us want a change.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lost Juliet some of us want a change.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Gaelic Hit Factory

A tag has been placed on Gaelic Hit Factory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 22:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Currentbadseeds.jpg

Hello, Codu. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Currentbadseeds.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Codu. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Msnmessenger-logonscreen-xp.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Msnmessenger-logonscreen-xp.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:3X07 JulietIsland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3X07 JulietIsland.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jackstrangerland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackstrangerland.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Islands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Islands.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Breakcar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Breakcar.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Adventuresingramophone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adventuresingramophone.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adventures in Gramophone

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adventures in Gramophone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability is not properly established

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 11:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucky Me (EP)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lucky Me (EP), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 11:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Codu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 166 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mikel Albizu Iriarte - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]