User talk:CodixImx

Image tagging for Image:Codix.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Codix.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CodixOffice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CodixOffice.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CodixLogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CodixLogo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imx

I've userfied your article for you to work on User:CodixImx/Sandbox. However I wouldn't get too hopeful. Your username indicates this is a conflict of interest. Generally if something is notable someone else will have written about it. Examples you gave me include software that is notable. This product does not seem to be. Existence is not notability. Also you need some reliable third party sources to back up the text. Why not see WP:YFA for more information. You're welcome to ammend it in your sandbox and please give me a shout and I'll review it. But unless there is a clear assertation of why this is notable it's unlikely to make it back into mainspace. Pedro : Chat 12:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Codix.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Codix.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CODIX

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CODIX. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CODIX. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]