User talk:Codenameriley
File copyright problem with File:Keep-On-Lovin-You-reba-mcentire-7734009-600-400.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Keep-On-Lovin-You-reba-mcentire-7734009-600-400.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep On Loving You (album)
[edit]We don't put reviews in the infobox anymore. If you have a review, please cite it in the text and summarize the content of the review. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 13:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Reba McEntire discography, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Baed1b12d44bf8ba4df3c163aa03b54d.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Baed1b12d44bf8ba4df3c163aa03b54d.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 23:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Say OK do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TbhotchTalk C. 01:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Consider Me Gone. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. N419BH 01:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to I Keep On Loving You. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Wintonian (talk) 01:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Nomination of List of awards received by Reba McEntire for deletion
[edit]The article List of awards received by Reba McEntire is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. It appears to be an out-of-date list superseded by List of awards and nominations received by Reba McEntire.--Michaela den (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Top 40 charts
[edit]I have reverted all your additions to this site. It is not a reliable reference, as it listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Please, don't add it again. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)