User talk:Cockerspanielsarethebest
|
Edits to biographical articles
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Richard L. Scott. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ([1]). MastCell Talk 18:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tea Party protests. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Loonymonkey (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Tea Party protests. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alan (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Pipe Down, Mitchell! You know it's true!
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Richard L. Scott, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erik9 (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Deville (Talk) 02:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)October 2009
[edit]Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fox News Channel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fox News Channel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alan (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fox News Channel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. The Four Deuces (talk) 17:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
[edit]Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Elizabeth Cheney. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)