User talk:CnlPepper

Thank you for the nice clean-up of "mast." Looks great now.

I can't claim credit for the clean up, I only updated the MAST fusion link. The person you want to thank is User:Commander Keane. CnlPepper 16:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JointEuropeanTorus internal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JointEuropeanTorus internal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of "Image sourced from the EFDA-JET public relations page. According to the JET image page these images may be used free of charge for educational purposes. Copyright is held by EFDA-JET. Producing a free replacement is practically impossible as photographic access to the machine is extremely limited. Access to the internals of the machine are also strictly off limits to the public." does not explain the rational for the use of the image? Read the page next time. --CnlPepper 15:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see this isn't the first time you've done this to other wiki contributors. Cut it out or I will request your ability to edit wikipedia be removed for a short time. --CnlPepper 15:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JointEuropeanTorus external.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JointEuropeanTorus external.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 09:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you try and fix it then, isn't that the point of a wiki? Unlike you obviously do, many contributors have a life and can't usually edit things within 7 days. So why don't you cut people some slack. It depressing to encounter morose individuals like youself who apply the rules so hard in trying to "improve" wikipedia that they end up making it a chore for ordinary people to contribute and hence decrease active interest in the project. --CnlPepper 16:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]