User talk:CnkALTDS/archive

Contributions

Your link is broken here. On the English Wikipedia, it is Special:Contributions/CnkALTDS. --Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 23:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I missed it! :)--CnkALTDS^message 11:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:122.108.4.69

Hi

This is to let you know that you can actually blank your own talk page. When editors remove comments off their talk page it is normally seen that that is their way of acknowledging the warning. Please see WP:BLANK, any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page :) --5 albert square (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
Well, let me apologize for this little matter. However I created my home account here on English Wikipedia, normally I was caring for Turkish Wikipedia. Because of some matters I started to continue my contributions here. So I know about all Wikipedia rules, just don't know some different ones between all language projects. And I guess this is just a specific one in en.wikipedia project. I guess users (registered or anonymous) should not remove the content of their talk pages. (If there is no vandalism content) But of course they are free to archive their talk pages. Otherwise how will we (all user groups, especially patrollers) able to check which level of warning template has been sent to them or their behaviours. You know such warning templates are really important to be able to watch a user. Just an example; A is keeping a vandal behaviour, so B has warned A on his/her talk page. So the used template is {{uw-vandal1}}. Then A removed the content of his/her talk page but also kept behaving as vandal. Then C warned A this time. So it would probably be the same level of warning. Noone checkes the talkpage history during their anti-vandal war. Thank you :)--CnkALTDS^message 20:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cevdet Kılıçlar

Selam Cnk. Nasıl gidiyor ? Rica etsem Cevdet Kılıçlar maddesini kontrol eder misin ? Özellikle İngilizce ifadeleri. Anladığım kadarıyla İngilizcen bayağı iyidir. İyi çalışmalar. Görüşürüz. Takabeg (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Olayın kurbanlarından Cevdet Kılıçlar, İbrahim Bilgen, Çetin Topçuoğlu, Furkan Doğan, Ali Heyder Bengi maddeleri mevcuttur (İngilizce Vikide). Bunlardan İbrahim Bilgen SRS gösterildi ve kalabildi. Bence mucize oldu. Şu an Furkan Doğan ve Ali Heyder Bengi SAS aşamasında. ABD vatandaşlığı çok kıymetli de TC vatandaşılığı kımetsiz mi acaba ? Kanımca ikisi de kayda değer diğiller. Ben dokuz kurbanı inceledim ve KD olanın tek Cevdet Kılıçlar olduğunu düşündüğüm için geliştirmeye çalıştım. Sence de KD mi ? {{Notability}} etiketinin kalması uygun mu ? Takabeg (talk) 06:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cumania

Done and the user has been warned. Regards--CnkALTDS^message 06:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Selam Cnk. Ergenekon maddesi düzelttim. Ama İngilizcem bayağı bozuktur. Kontrol eder misin ? Takabeg (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kusura bakma Takabeg, gec kaldigim icin. Cogu zaman online olamiyorum.. Saniyorum ki duzeltmisler. Iyi calismalar.--CnkALTDS^message 17:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ergenekon

Selam Cnk. Ergenekon maddesi düzelttim. Ama İngilizcem bayağı bozuktur. Kontrol eder misin ? Takabeg (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kusura bakma Takabeg, gec kaldigim icin. Cogu zaman online olamiyorum.. Saniyorum ki duzeltmisler. Iyi calismalar.--CnkALTDS^message 17:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kusurun yok. Düzeltmiş. Ama kaynaklara bakılmadan deforme de yapıldı. Mesela bunu tekrar değiştirdim. Ögel'in kendisi alakasız diyor. Yani uydurulmuş versiyonuna bakıldığında tartışmalıymış gibi gözüküyor ama orijinallere göre tartışılacak durum yoktur. İyi tatiller. Takabeg (talk) 18:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tekrar kontrol ettim. Büyük bir sorun yoktu. Bye. Takabeg (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elinde ders kitapları duruyor mu ? Bunun kaynaklandırılması ve bunun kontrol edilmesi lazım. Takabeg (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Umm.. Ben de bunlarla ilgili ders kitabi hic olmadi :).. Ama arastiririm..--CnkALTDS^message 18:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cevdet Kılıçlar ve Hasan Sami Bolak da unutmazsan sevineceğim. Takabeg (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Su TBA mi?--CnkALTDS^message 00:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizmdir herhalde. Siyaset gereği sonradan ilan ettiği eklenebilir. Türkmeniz, Oğuz Türklerindeniz hikayeleri çok duyduk :) Takabeg (talk) 00:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kök Türük

Cnk. Tatilde misin ? Döndüğünde Göktürks maddesinin Etymology, Origins, Eastern Turkic Khaganate, Eastern Turks under the Jimi system bölümleri (yani kaynaklı bölümler :)) kontrol eder misin ? Takabeg (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Birde Bunu kontrol eder misin ? Takabeg (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*
*

Issues are above have been fixed and related articles have been reverted to previous version. For next, if you claim the user,CenkX, removes primary sourced informations as you complain it's wrong what he/she does, please don't hesitate to kick up this matter to administrators. Thank you for your interest and contributions. Best regards. —CnkALTDS 15:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim of vandalism against my edit reflects your personal view, and not constructive at all. If you really want to behave constructively, please read Turkish version, where we had reached a permanent consensus on the matter. Thank you!--CenkX (talk) 02:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by my edit, and would make another such edit again now, if you removed sources content. Rules and mostly acts of managing between Wikipedia projects are different. As all users, you are free to edit/remove content of articles on En.wikipedia project. But any user should use the talk page of an article if their contributions are about removing primary sources. You can even drop a link about the consensus, had by Tr.wikipedia users, on the talk page of related article. Else, your this edit will be counted as a misuse. Happy editing.—CnkALTDS 11:35, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Göktürks

Hey, can you please check the article above? User:CenkX removes sources content of the related article. I have checked the talk page of article, but there is no post by this user about his/her contributions of removing primary sources. User has been warned once, but he/she reverted his/her edit back. Thank you in advance. Best regards. —CnkALTDS 11:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am just going off-line. I have fully protected the article for 24 hours pending an investigation into what is happening there. This means that only an admin can edit the article for the next 24 hours. I will be back online in a few hours and I'll look into the matter then. SilkTork *^YES! 11:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SilkTork, I want to thank to you for your attention. I have reverted edits to last correct revision before telling you about this issue. I do know about protection policy. Thank you once again. Regards. —CnkALTDS 11:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked into the edit dispute on the Göktürks article, and have made a proposal on Talk:Göktürks. SilkTork *^YES! 19:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CenkX has accepted the proposal, and is prepared to work with it. I'd like to get your view before proceeding, as you first brought this to my attention. SilkTork *^YES! 08:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teşekürler

Ayrıntılı cevabınız için çok teşekürler.Koruma yapılıp kaldırılması tamam.Dünkü olayda ise ben o sayfaya dün ekleme yapmıştım 10-11 eylül arasında değil.Viki tr de böyle şeylere maruz kaldım o yüzden böyle sormak ihtiyacı hissettim,böyle ruh hastaları beninle hep uğraşmıştır.Burda da mı takip ediliyorum acaba dedim.Herneyse meseleyi uzatmayacağım nasılsa her katkımı e postama kayıt ediyorum. --Kamuran Ötükenli (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cenk. How are you ? Did you leave from Ansiklopedika ? Takabeg (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Takabeg, thank you. I'm doing pretty cool. Hope that you are doing good. Well, as you are aware of I'm not administrating Ansiklopedika anymore. Bilge, you know who, has already stopped to administrate there, too. Take care =) —CnkALTDS 11:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido. Takabeg (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Selam

Cnk. Aniden gmail'e giremez oldum. Abi ile görüşüyor musun ? User talk:Levent'e mesaj bıraktığımı iletirsen sevineceğim. Hoşçakalın. Takabeg (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uzun zaman oldu kendisiyle gorusmeyeli. Ulasmaya calisirim. —CnkALTDS 21:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nasıl gidiyor ? Umarım iyisindir. Abiye ulaşabildim. Şifremi buldum ve gmail artık çalışıyor :) See you. Takabeg (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tesekkurler, iyiyim. Umarim sizde de keyifler iyidir. Isinizi halletmenize sevindim. Gorusmek uzere :) —CnkALTDS 19:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]