User talk:Clumsily
 | This User is wikibreak to attend the Faculty of Law, Thammasat University and will be back once studying is over. Messages might not receive a timely response. |
Aniccā vata saṃkhāra
Uppādavayadhammino
Uppājjitvā nirujjhanti
Tesaṃ vūpasamo sukho
Nothing is permanent.
It is the nature that
everything arises and passes away.
Once arisen, it disappears.
Understanding such nature is true happiness.
— Buddha
Amphoe Galyani Vadhana
[edit]Thanks for the additions in Amphoe Galyani Vadhana, due to the Christmas vacations I just noticed the decree today. Since you seem to be quite knowledgeable on Thai law maybe you can explain me a small thing. You wrote that it was signed by the king on December 18. I am no expert with these decrees, but the PDF shows the name Abhisit at bottom. I always thought that the name at bottom is the same who signed the document to make it official. Or are the decrees in book ก different from those in book ง, and need to be signed by the king himself to become official? andy (talk) 22:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your explanations. Through my Wikipedia editing on the provinces and districts of Thailand I got quite deep into the topic of the administrative subdivision of Thailand - not easy with my very limited knowledge of Thai language and the lack of resources in English. Ever since I discovered the Royal Gazette to be available online, I found a lot of interesting things even though I only understood parts of it. So I noticed before that the announcements for district creations look different than for minor district (King Amphoe), but I only checked for the signatures now. Same as with your field of editing her, there are hardly any co-workers in my topics - I even tried to attract some by writing a blog but that has mostly readers who know less about the topics than me. andy (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Dirty po
[edit]Your user name is apt. This edit could certainly be called clumsy. An hand-written reason for deletion is perfectly acceptable providing the reason is meaningful. You do not need to remember the vast range of deletion templates but the one in this case is {{db-redirtypo}}. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Legal codes of Thailand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Template coding
[edit]Please note that you broke the image coding for {{Infobox flood}} with this edit. You must specify a default size for images if you allow for users to provide their custom sizes. This has been fixed. Just be careful in the future. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
รูปน่ารักดี ใครอ่ะ
[edit]น่ารักมากๆเลยอ่ะ มีเป็นอลบัมเลย คุณไปถ่ายใครมาเหรอครับ อันที่จริงแล้วคุณก็ยังเขียนบนวิเกรียนพีเดียแห่งนี้นะครับ
ขอวิจารณ์คุณหน่อยครับ ผมไม่เชื่อว่าคุณเป็นผู้หญิงจริง เพียงเพราะพฤติกรรมดูเป็นเกรียนเข้าไปเขียนมากกว่าครับ เพียงเพราะสัดส่วนผู้หญิงที่เกรียนมีน้อยกว่าผู้ชายครับ-- เคแอลแอล_โจ — Preceding unsigned comment added by KLL Joe (talk • contribs) 14:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
เพิ่มเติมครับ ผมอยากทราบว่าคุณเป็นพวกล้มเจ้าด้วยเหรอครับเห็นเรียนทำไมสาด โดยส่วนตัวผมต่อต้านการล้มเจ้าและไม่สนับสนุนเจ้า(แปลง่ายๆก็คือ ถ้ามันมีอยู่ก็มีไปเหอะ ถ้าระบบกษัตริย์ถูกล้มก็จะไม่ไปยุให้มันกลับมามีใหม่) เพียงแต่ผมเกลียดไอ้ปรีดี พนมหยง มากๆเลยครับ--โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 14:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- เข้ามาแล้วแต่จะว่างค่ะ ไม่ได้เข้ามาประจำเหมือนแต่ก่อนแล้ว
- ไม่ได้ล้มเจ้าค่ะ เห็นว่าสถาบันกษัตริย์ควรปรับปรุงในหลาย ๆ แต่ถ้าจะล้มไปก็ไม่ได้ว่าอะไร
- จะเชื่อว่าเราเป็นหญิง เป็นชาย เป็นตุ๊ด เป็นแต๋วก็แล้วแต่ จะเชื่ออย่างไหนเราก็ไม่ได้เดือดร้อนอะไรค่ะ
Template:Thai case infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)