User talk:Cloverfielder

Welcome!

Hello, Cloverfielder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nintendo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sobriety syndrome

A tag has been placed on Sobriety syndrome, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sobriety syndrome

A tag has been placed on Sobriety syndrome, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Sobriety syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big dog syndrome

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Big dog syndrome, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nick Penguin_(contribs) 02:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enough with the made-up "syndromes"

Stop writing articles about so-called "syndromes" that you made up. You'll be blocked if you keep this up. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Big dog syndrome

An article that you have been involved in editing, Big dog syndrome, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big dog syndrome. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking is futile

Your attempt to hide your record of user warnings by blanking your user talk page is seen as an attempt to evade your prior warnings about conduct that is against Wikipedia policy. As you can see, such efforts are futile, as they can easily be reverted by an administrator or other user. Such action is also seen as acting in bad faith. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]