User talk:CloudNine/Archive5

In Utero

Most of the info in the Recording section comes from Come As You Are, so I can take care of that in a day or two. You can trim and add cite tags if you want. You might want to take the lead on arranging a Critical Reception section. Also, we could use one or two more soundclips. One of the more abrasive songs should definitley be included ("Radio Friendly Unit Shifter", "Very Ape") and maybe one of the singles (I personally favor "Heart-Shaped Box"). WesleyDodds 08:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you?

Review LeToya Luckett again? The article has been improved. So it may follows GA criteria now. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 23:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've fixed those issues that you have stated toward LeToya Luckett article, but not only those as well as many others Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 00:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very minor formatting issue

I know this is a very minor issue, but why I've noticed you keep changing album articles to have only a single linebreak after the album infobox, while I keep changing them to have two. I most recently noticed that here. I think it would be productive if we could come to some agreement on this. The reason I change articles to have two line breaks is only because in my experience that's what the vast majority have, and I prefer album articles to be as uniformly formatted as possible. --PEJL 20:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! (Single line breaks between section headings and the first paragraph is what I've found to be most common for album articles as well.) --PEJL 21:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hi there, CloudNine. You reverted an edit i've made in the Kurt Cobain article and gave no justification. I just put the flags of the places of birth and death. What was wrong with the flags? Could you tell me why did you revert it?

--Bluedenim 16:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK

--Bluedenim 16:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=)

Eduemoni has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Thanks for guiding me on Luckett's article!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 17:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question:

Awards and nominations cannot be in table like it previously was? [1] Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 18:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lock RHCP

Vandalism keeps on coming since the lock went away. Could we lock it again? Xihix 03:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Erdelyi.jpeg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Erdelyi.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Judy

Hi. IP 70.69.51.111 (Alberta, Canada) has been blocked for abuse in the past. If you have any more problems please get in touch. -- Kleinzach 04:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image disappeared from Music of Israel

I visited the page just now and discovered that the image Image:HoraIsraeliDance.jpg has disappeared. Someone a few weeks ago noted that there was insufficient documentation for the source of the picture, and I added the missing information to the description (I took the picture from the Israeli Wikipedia, which has detailed documentation on the source and copyright of the picture in Hebrew).

But, as far as I can tell, the picture wasn't deleted - it just disappeared. When I try to view the delete log, it says there is none.

You have any ideas what happened?

thanks for your help, --Ravpapa 19:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Monkey Gone to Heaven

The article Monkey Gone to Heaven you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Monkey Gone to Heaven for things needed to be addressed. Giggy _U^CP 05:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it now, and decide ASAP. Giggy _U^CP 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Giggy _U^CP 10:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the comment. I really like the album, and I couldn't bare to see it in such bad shape. I'm trying to get it peer reviewed to fix some stuff, and hopefully it'll be FA sooner or later. I've really, I suppose, grown up since the RHCP editing, I'm going to be a lot better Wikipedia editor :). Xihix 16:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing work with copy editing and moving around in Dookie! Ace work. Xihix 19:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frank and guitar

I hope you've not gone on holiday to Venezuela, or somewhere, because Frank Black's on the Colin Murray show tonight (OK, I spect you knew that). Have a good hols.qp10qp 15:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Jam FAC

Now that the Be Here Now FAC is concluded I should be able to address any points that come up at FAC, especially given your holiday-ing. I've got a bit to struggle with regarding Grunge music at FAR, though. WesleyDodds 10:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, the Alt music newsletter will probably be delivered tomorrow night. I'll be away til then, and I don't have access to AWB now. Sorry about the delay. Thanks, --(Review Me) R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 10:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Weekly Notification

Just a super quick note, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 21 is out and can be downloaded at the usual places (if you've forgotten, WikipediaWeekly.com works wonders. -- Tawkerbot 01:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Math rock groups

Not necessarily--it just means somebody hasn't gotten around to making an article for those groups (assuming they are notable enough to deserve one). The music I listened to of those two groups, IMO, is at least at the level of the most representative groups of the genre. Badagnani 07:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 4 - July 2007

"Thurston Moore? Is that your real name? I mean, give me a break. You made that up. That's a good one. Did you have a mom and shit like that?" - Gibby Haynes
Project news

Californication (album), Dookie, Be Here Now, and By the Way reached featured article status and Wilco discography reached featured list status in the past month! We now have 20 articles of featured quality. Well done to the various WP:RHCP editors, Xihix, Ceoil, WesleyDodds, and Teemu08.
Kate Bush was featured on the Main Page on July 30.
We collaborated on Meat Puppets, In Utero, "Touch Me I'm Sick", John Frusciante, and Zeitgeist (The Smashing Pumpkins album) during the past month.
During the month of July, Sky Blue Sky, R.E.M. (band), "Monkey Gone to Heaven", A.M. (album), The Cure, Blood Sugar Sex Magik, Wilco, Loose Fur, John Frusciante, A Ghost Is Born and Being There (album), a total of 11 articles, were promoted to good article status; a record month. We now have 33 GAs, out of a total of ~680 articles.

New members

Killereditors, Xihix, M2Ys4U and Lostvalley joined the alternative music fold during July.

Editors

User:CloudNine, User:WesleyDodds

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

SR West Country and Battle of Britain Classes

Hello, I noticed you were on the wikipedia trains project as part of a peer review. I am wondering whether you are interested in giving your opinion on the article SR West Country and Battle of Britain Classes, as I have listed it for FA status, but any further things that need doing, or even support for the article's progress through the selection process would be gratefully received (that's enough plugging, must think about WP: Canvass!). However, your imput would be of help to the project. Cheers, --Bulleid Pacific 17:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Pearl Jam

In reply: (1) I am lost as to why you were unable to reply to the critique. (2) The if statements are left over from the substitution (this critique format is generated from a template). (3) I believe that Grunge should be capitalized, but it's a very iffy call that I will concede to. But generally, art movements are capitalized, but when used generally or as adjectives they are not. (The formation of Alternative music marked the beginning... OR the alternative band Hinder). Its not a biggied, and the rules confuse me as well.--Esprit15d 15:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the #if showing.--Esprit15d 15:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have one more suggestion, and then I'll reverse my vote. See FAC page.--Esprit15d 18:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hott! I'll go and change my vote.--Esprit15d 22:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Idea

What do you think of moving indie music to "independent music"? Now that I think about it, it's a more sensible title and cuts down on confusion regarding proper genres like indie rock and indie pop. WesleyDodds 00:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List promos in a separate section, like Nirvana discography since they're not "proper" singles. As for moving Indie music, is there a bot that can fix all the redirect links, or will I have to do that manually? WesleyDodds 07:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm going to add material to Let It Be right now. Which version of the book do you want to go by when citing pages? If you want to go by yours I can include my page references but you can change them to the pages in your book. There's much of a difference (our versions seem to be a page or two off), but it's enough we should adhere to one version when citing pages. WesleyDodds 07:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realized "I Will Dare" was released as a single, so I made a page for it. That might help focusing the main album page. WesleyDodds 07:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jude

If you can, use your songbook to construct a composition section, or add composition details to the existing sections. Thanks. WesleyDodds 21:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your comment on the King Crimson FAC

I can't find a citation for the GG&F formation date, but I notice you like Husker Du. So do I. I'd like to see their article reach GA/FA at some stage.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a major issue, really.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare FA?

Do you know something the others don't? The FAC page hasn't been closed and Raul hasn't passed down his decision. RedRabbit 16:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Sorry. RedRabbit 16:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you adopted the Rollins article, how about another one...

The article on Garbage (band) is up at GA/R too. Thought you might like to know... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pixies images

Hi, I noticed you replaced a couple of images I removed from Pixies song articles, for example Image:SurferRosa.jpg. I originally removed them because fair use of album artwork should really only be used to illustrate articles about the album itself - not individual songs. There is no fair use rationale specified for use of Pixies images in song articles, and I'm not sure if it can be justified. There was a fairly dead ended discussion on this at Template talk:Infobox Song. What do you think? Is it possible to add fair use rationales for inclusion of the images in song articles? Papa November 14:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there must be a separate rationale for each time an image is used. See WP:NFC#Tagging non-free image files for guideline. I agree that removal of images from song articles is controversial however and I have started a discussion here if you'd like to comment. Thanks Papa November 14:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Metal Project suggestion

I read your suggestion on the Metal page and would like to hear more about it. Feel free to drop in sometime. LuciferMorgan 15:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on my page are rather astute, and I wholly agree with them. There's this current culture where Metal editors are more concerned with creating articles on obscure bands than improving articles related to the bigger bands, which is rather unfortunate. I certainly don't mind it being similar to the ALM Project design. While I'm real grateful for your help, I will admit that I am somewhat sceptical that it will transform the Project.

You said if I have a question. Well, I do. How come a redesign of the front page transformed the Project? A lot of the Metal editors are fly by visitors to be honest, and their signature shouldn't have even been registered. It's more a statement of liking Metal music than taking measures to improve the presence of Metal on Wikipedia. LuciferMorgan 21:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy with any help you can give. I certainly understand the ALM page much better than HMM, that's for sure. LuciferMorgan 22:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just made a page for peer reviews for the Metal Project - is there anything I've missed in making it? LuciferMorgan 11:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be cool if we could put parameters on the template for Project peer review. Also, on the ALM PR there's two categories at the end of the page - not sure what they do though. LuciferMorgan 11:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hey, can you use your super-powers to delete my userpage. There is nothing unthwart in there, just a bunch of, frankly, embarrasing 'i did this i did that' edits. I'd like to keep my talk and my various subpages. Thanks. Ceoil 00:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; that's a blessed relief. Ceoil 10:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grunge

I'm hoping to be done with sourcing by the end of the week (particularly since I'll be leaving town this weekend). It's coming along nicely. It's convenient when I can just pull sources from articles we've already worked on so I don't have to keep going through my books and magazines. Do you have any additional thoughts on how it's going? WesleyDodds 09:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, can you include the publication date for all the citations that reference that Q special you have? If no month is listed just list the year. WesleyDodds 09:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see a way we can work this Time article in? WesleyDodds 20:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't even notice anything was wrong. WesleyDodds 10:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal pictures

Thinking with the increase of FAs at the alt-rock portal we should increase the number of pictures so it isn't so repetitive (I think there's like six in the Selected Image queue). Searched a bit and these two stand out for me: [2] [3] Let me know if any others strike you. Kinda thinking about the infobox one at John Frusciante, but that might be on its way to FA in the next few months so it'd show up at the portal anyway. WesleyDodds 09:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another good one: [4] I definitely agree we need more DYK; I've been hesitant about adding more because I want to make sure the facts are verified first, for understandable reasons. WesleyDodds 10:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I added a pretty interesting DYK to the Portal's nomination section. NSR77 ^T_C 20:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of pharmacy schools in the United Kingdom

I don't understand why you didn't finish the job you started on this entry? It looks ugly half done and not even that. Regards. Hermant patel 11:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could have at least still converted the whole list into the tablet format, even with certain details missing. Regards. Hermant patel 12:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Image:Buster Martin.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image:Buster Martin.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Frusciante

Hey CloudNine. Just dropping by to see if you could take a look at the Frusciante article for me, as the peer review which was requested yielded virtually nothing. Assuming you will, just drop a few suggestions on my talk page; don't feel as though you have to, though! Regards, NSR77 ^T_C 16:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvana

Remember, we can use my temp page to craft the Musical Style and Legacy sections. I've started off with writing down some basic points to address. Feel free to work on it when you can. I myself might not get to it until Monday since I'm mainly focusing right now on citing the article. WesleyDodds 22:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to Pearl Jam, I think it's as simple as that we've established a consensus, and there's been no criticism of the citation aside from unfamiliar editors. In related news, you might want to take a further look at the Nirvana talk page. Editing the page has become harder that I thought it would be. WesleyDodds 22:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been placing random quotes and info about the band's music on the temp page that can be crafted into prose. I'll add more as I find it. WesleyDodds 04:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music August 2007 Newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 5 - August 2007

"The amount of time it took to get Morrissey onstage was getting longer and longer. There was this great game he'd play of wanting to be asked 15 times if it had been 14 the night before. Johnny was like, 'Let's rock!' and Mozzer would be 'Well, somebody's gotta ask me another seven times.'" - Andy Rourke
Project news

Blood Sugar Sex Magik and Sky Blue Sky reached featured article status in the past month! Well done to the various WP:RHCP editors and Teemu08.
We collaborated on Let It Be (Replacements album), Queens of the Stone Age, Dinosaur Jr, and Loveless (album) during the past month.
During the month of August, Summerteeth, Anodyne (album), and The Make-Up were promoted to good article status.

New members

Freaky4jesus32, Razorblade666, and Grim-Gym joined the alternative music fold during August.

Editors

User:WesleyDodds

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yudell Luke.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yudell Luke.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The Pope is Catholic

I did not, to be fair, call the article gibberish. As far as nonsense is concerned, this is perhaps a definition question; while the phraseology clearly is normal usage, the article in my view is conceptually nonsense. However, I will not argue the point and will make no change to the status of the article. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 22:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

If possible, could you delete this image, as a free replacement of the exact same this has been recovered. Regards, NSR77 ^T_C 21:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! NSR77 ^T_C 23:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 28

Good news, everyone: Wikipedia Weekly Episode 28 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/04/wikipedia-weekly-28/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project!

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 04:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Audioslave

Hi CloudNine, I saw your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Audioslave. I had offered to help the nominator shorten the article by moving relevant content to the article on the specific albums. But I know you're experienced with band FAs so wanted to ask: 1) do you think it needs shortening 2) is my proposal the best way to shorten it and 3) would you like to copy edit before or after I attempt to move content to album pages? --JayHenry 00:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've ended up being busier than I expected this week, and haven't done as much work to Audioslave as I'd hoped. I ran it through a word counter and it's actually not much bigger than some other band FAs. If you want to go ahead and copy edit, please feel free. I'm not going to have time, I don't think, to make many substantial changes. --JayHenry 06:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics

No, I am sorry, I do not agree! Every Olympic competitor is notable! There have been enough discussions in the past (E.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Murray (athlete)). And winning a bronze medal is in any case notable. Please be so kind in revert your edits. Thanks and :) Doma-w 11:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvana songs

I mentioned to Brandt Luke Zorn that we should probably turn a number of Nirvana song articles into redirects. I've already turned the most insubstantial song pages into redirects (most of them now redirect to With the Lights Out). You might want to tackle a few you feel really wouldn't sustain full articles. WesleyDodds 10:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving sections of pages

How do I properly move a section of a page to a new page, with out copy/paste? For example, I think the Moline, Illinois#Neighborhoods section is too long for the main page, and think there should be a separate article called "Moline Neighborhoods". Please help! Ctjf83 19:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i'll see how well i can clean it up...and i think if i understood correctly, if it is split, i have to have an admin move the previous article history to the new one, not sure if that is right, cause then it would have all the previous edits, not just the ones related to the neighborhoods. let me know if you find out! Ctjf83 20:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friends

The Friends article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 02:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yudell_Luke.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yudell_Luke.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linkage

I mgiht as well spread the love to others besides Ceoil: [5]. WesleyDodds 23:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this should prove useful [6]. WesleyDodds 04:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only discovered the New York Times archive after Ceoil gave me a link to an article there when I was working on "Smells Like Teen Spirit". Definitely a valuable resources; there's a lot of Pixies articles there, and it's interesting to see them use the phrase "alternative rock" quite frequently in the late 1980s. If you want to access an article that requires payment you might want to ask Ceoil, since he has an account there. WesleyDodds 21:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be a good idea. Ceoil has a membership with that as well. WesleyDodds 23:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pixies

Just testing to see what a featured article with free images could be like - this is a repeated problem we have with band articles. (The fact that featured articles are often not of featured quality is another one - this article is fine though!). ELIMINATORJR 20:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NIN articles

Thanks for the help! Keep looking through those magazines, hopefully you can find something useful. I have no acess to that kinda thing, so we'll have to scrounge whatever we can. Thanks again. Drewcifer 12:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing a fair use rationale

Hi, if you want to use Image:Huskerduband.jpg under a fair use claim, can you please edit the image page to state explicitly which article or articles you are making the claim for and why. While such details as an image being low resolution or it being impossible to obtain a free image, etc. are a very relevant part of a fair use rationale, it really is necessary to state in what way the image contributes significantly to a particular article. This prevents abuse of FU by putting non-free images into articles in which they are purely decorative. For example, there was an image of Saddam (now deleted) which had a handwritten FU rationale saying that the image showed how easily Saddam sat on his throne, and that image was being used to decorate the article 2006. There is no such thing as a non-free image which is fair use in itself: it can only be fair use in a particular article or (more unusually) in particular articles. Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 10:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]