User talk:Closetindex

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Mwalla (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

SPCUClerkbot (talk)

Welcome!

Hello, Closetindex! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 ^discuss 17:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --aktsu ^(t / c) 00:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I added by the sourced portion and agree to leave out the unsourced portion. Is this okay? Closetindex (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex[reply]

Sure, I actually didn't intent to remove it but since I'm using rollback it was removed anyway. Btw, did you use the right source on the Jens Pulver article? I couldn't find anything about her entering the cage in it. Also, be mindful of or netural point of view-policy. Writing things like "In a touching personal moment" isn't really encyclopedic. Cheers, --aktsu ^(t / c) 00:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but it makes for good drama :) I linked to Jens blog, which mentions the miscarriage, but still does not prove that she entered the ring. Perhaps I should re-edit it. Also, I added back some of quote about Royce and agree with you about original research... I guess it is just my own theory as to why he used steriods. Closetindex (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex[reply]

I hate to bring up every little thing, but as I'm guessing the miscarriage thing is sourced to the comment on Pulvers's website I should point out that such comments aren't considered reliable sources and are thus not acceptable. No worries though, because the broadcast itself is perfectly acceptable as a source for what he said (just not interpretations of what he said) so by replacing it with "WEC 34 broadcast" or similar it should be fine :) --aktsu ^(t / c) 01:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair. I agree about blogs not being good sources. Also, you removed a quote on the royce gracie page and I tried to put it back up. If it still looks shady, feel free to remove it Closetindex (talk) 01:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)closetindex[reply]

It should be fine IMO.. I was the commentary on it that was the problem (original research etc). --aktsu ^(t / c) 01:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]