User talk:CliffordJones
|
A comment
[edit]I've replied to you on my talk page - but I would add that comments like this have no place on an article talk page, and indeed no place in Wikipedia. Please, try to respect other editors who have made far more constructive edits here, over a far longer period, than you have. Wikipedia is based around the concept of collaboration, and working constructively together, even with people with whom you disagree or dislike. Don't just read WP:NPA, take it to heart. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
PS: Nor is this comment helpful. Starting from the statement that "I shall be removing it..." is never a good idea. If other people disagree with you, your comment will be reverted and discussions will continue. Be aware of policy on edit warring and, I strongly suggest, consider taking a less adversarial position. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- I will remove any information that is not accurate and back it up with sources. If others want to question reliable sources and discuss that, fair enough. CliffordJones (talk) 08:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Cliff Richard are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. If you want to discuss another editor's conduct, you should do so on their user talk page. McGeddon (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for welcoming me into the Wikipedia community. I plan to make constructive edits to articles and any information I add to be backed up with reliable sources. Cheers! CliffordJones (talk) 10:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- I shall soon be able to edit the Cliff Richard article and be able to add information with reliable sources. CliffordJones (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
CliffordJones, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi CliffordJones! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 21:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Kris Kristofferson
- added a link pointing to The First Edition
- Shakin' Stevens
- added a link pointing to CBS Records
- Shakin' Stevens and the Sunsets
- added a link pointing to CBS Records
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California Dreamin', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gwen Guthrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Copacabana (song), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- I won't be fighting this, but surely there is a difference between original research and obvious fact. Copacabana is known by the majority of the British public, like several other songs that never made the top 40 charts, and is more recognised today than many songs that were big chart hits in the past too. If it's parent album sold well and went top 20, which it did, two positions shy of the top 10 in fact, and it was included on a compilation album a matter of months later that sold even better, there is no reason to doubt at all those are truer reflections of the songs popularity in that country than the low chart placing of the original single release. Singles were largely released to try and sell albums. Manilow was a MOR act, not a teen sensation. Those audiences usually buy albums. CliffordJones (talk) 17:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- You may be correct, but we need a reliable source that made a statement to that effect. DonIago (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Manilow Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Band Aid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm Some Gadget Geek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hewlett-Packard, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suddenly (Billy Ocean album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, CliffordJones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited It's a Good Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby Doyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CliffordJones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Angela Rayner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
All members of the British parliament have the rt. hon title. They don't just use it for some and not others. Watch PMQs. They are all reffered to as "the rt. hon. lady" or "the rt. hon gentlemen". Indeed each MP HAS to refer to their peers in this fashion when addressing them, they CAN NOT use any other form of address. So warch it. Asking for a source? You really think news articles and such like are going tp use it? Gimme a break. I suppose we should now remove the title from the page of every MP for the reason they are all unsourced. But no, lets not & just not include it on a seclet few. Bizzare & barbaric! CliffordJones (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Owen Owen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BHS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CliffordJones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CliffordJones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Recent edit to Crisp 'n Dry
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Crisp 'n Dry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Debenhams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BHS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Kennards
[edit]Hi - Please can you take some time to read WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:RS. I note your comment "None of the intro is "sourced" does that mean we should erase it?". Please also read WP:LEAD. The lead should be a summary of the main section and does not need to be referenced providing the material it summarises is properly sourced: I have added some missing citations. Dormskirk (talk) 11:12, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alworths, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Redhill and Wilko.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)