User talk:Cliff Wayenberg
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniël Wayenberg. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant talk 19:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniël Wayenberg was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant talk 18:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniël Wayenberg, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Daniël Wayenberg
[edit]
Hello Cliff Wayenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Daniël Wayenberg.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniël Wayenberg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 00:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Cliff Wayenberg,
It seems to me that an article you worked on, Daniel Wayenberg, may be copied from http://en.muziekencyclopedie.nl/action/entry/Daniel+Wayenberg. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Wayenberg
[edit]Hello Cliff Wayenberg,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Wayenberg for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ishdarian 09:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
About Daniel Wayenberg
[edit]Cliff Wayenberg, I've read nl:Daniël Wayenberg. If this is the same person and the assertions made there are in fact correct, there is a valid Wikipedia article to be made about this person. Adding text that violates copyright is not the right way to go about it. Need help? Feel free to contact me. Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)