User talk:Cliff Shaffer

Your submission at Articles for creation

Double Crossover Merging Interchange, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 14:58, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

proposed deletion of DCMI

Proposed deletion of Double Crossover Merging Interchange

The article Double Crossover Merging Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article should be deleted as its subject fails to meet the GNG. The only citation referring to DCMIs seems to be promotional and would probably fail RS. Furthermore, no interchanges of this type have been built.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Above others (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Double Crossover Merging Interchange for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double Crossover Merging Interchange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Crossover Merging Interchange until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Above others (talk) 04:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello! Cliff Shaffer, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Mkdw^talk 03:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting on your proposal

You've proposed a change on Talk:Diverging diamond interchange#Reinsert Double Crossover Merging Interchange Section OR Undelete Original Standalone Article?. It is assumed that you already support your proposal, so it's improper for you to insert a reply prefaced with "SUPPORT". Such a comment gives the appearance that you're voting a second time. While Wikipedia works off consensus, not raw votes, discussion closers sometimes do use a vote count as a first step to assessing consensus. I've removed the comment, but if you'd like to restore parts of it as a reply to another commenter, you're welcome to do so. Imzadi 1979 → 05:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Imzadi1979, I did not know that, thank you for letting me know. I think I will add some of my comments back into a reply as you mentioned. By the way, it appears that you have experience with highways, do you have an opinion on the Double Crossover Merging Interchange? It you do, please share on the Diverging Diamond Interchange talk Page Cliff Shaffer (talk) 09:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]