Jump to content

User talk:ZZCam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Clientcenter)

Clientcenter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Clientcenter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


Clientcenter (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)==Speedy deletion nomination of K-Anthony==[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K-Anthony, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TAXIDICAE💰 17:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZZCam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a private user, not a company or organisation. I used a generator online to come up with an impersonal user name but I missed to check its suitability under the username policy. My article was about a music artist but I am not affiliated with the artist, I have not been paid to write the article or received compensation of any kind. This was my first attempt, I am a novice editor and I would like the opportunity to edit the article to ensure it and any future contributions are encyclopedic and meet the acceptable standard

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username seems to be acceptable. However, I don't believe that you wrote about this musician by chance and I am also unconvinced that you are a total novice based on your edits. I don't think there is a path forward here until you choose to be more forthcoming about how you came to edit about this musician, and tell what other subjects you might edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will add that any other request you make will be reviewed by someone else, so what happens here won't be up to me. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote about this musician because he is Jamaican and I have a huge interest in Jamaican music. However, the artist is not a reggae or Rastafarian artist, which is more atypical associated with Jamaican music, but a contemporary Christian artist there seem to be less of catalogue of Jamaican artist from this genre. Therefore I thought I give it a go as I like being creative and I rather enjoy writing as an outlet. I have never edited or created a wikipedia article before so yes I am a novice, my writing experience is from university and report writing at work (I work in transport strategy). I was hoping to write more articles about Jamaican artists in the future. CamO11

Then you may make another unblock request for someone else to review. If you convince the next reviewer, they will unblock you. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZZCam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a private user, not a company or organisation. I used a generator online to come up with an impersonal user name but I missed to check its suitability under the username policy. This was my first attempt, I have never edited or created a Wikipedia article before so I am a novice when it comes to encyclopedic writing, my writing experience is from university and report writing at work (I work in transport strategy). I wrote this article about a Jamaican contemporary artist as I have a huge interest in Jamaican music, I am not affiliated with the artist. Nor have I been paid or compensated in any way to write the article. Because the artist is not a reggae or Rastafarian artist, which is more atypical associated with Jamaican music, but a contemporary Christian artist there seem to be less of catalogue of Jamaican artist from this genre. Therefore I thought I give it a go as I like being creative and I rather enjoy writing as an outlet. I would like the opportunity to edit the article to ensure it is encyclopedic and meet the acceptable standard. I'd like to write more articles about Jamaican artists from this genre in the future.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, please only have one request open at a time. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

rename not successful

[edit]

The chosen username is too similar to existing usernames or it used to be username of someone else that got renamed: Camo 11, Carno 11 and Carno11. Please choose again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ZZCam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How about this username? I ran it through the global account information and it seem available

Accept reason:

Procedural acceptance to clear from CAT:UNBLOCK as was unblocked by Cullen328 at 22:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC). TheSandDoctor Talk 03:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Clientcenter to ZZCam

[edit]
globally renamed Clientcenter to ZZCam. Per user request --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

ZICAM, I have unblocked your account. Happy editing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]