User talk:Client Service 3000

480 (number)

Hey,

Thanks for contributing! Apologies for this, but the number 480 is unlikely to be suitable for a standalone article. The relevant Wikipedia guideline is WP:NNUMBER, although the exact boundary of what numbers deserve their own articles is oft debated. I have reinstated the redirect Ovinus (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Mojo Hand. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Susan Wojcicki—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2018 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2018 was changed by Client Service 3000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972414 on 2022-11-15T08:09:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Isaac Boa (staff)

Hello, Client Service 3000

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Isaac Boa (staff), for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stefka Bulgaria}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessica Markowitz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jessica Markowitz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 08:29, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and harassment. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]