User talk:Clasus1453

November 2023

Hello, I'm Nexovia. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nexovia (talk) 11:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The mistake I made was not giving the source for the change I made, and I have corrected it in the change I made now. I do not think what I made was a mistake and I will write it on the page you mentioned. Thank you. Clasus1453 (talk) 12:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Malatya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Battle of Koyulhisar (1461). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Battle of Malatya. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There were no ethnic group named "Azerbaijani" and especially not a nation named "Azerbaijan" in the Caucasus at that time. This is unamious in scholarship [1] [2] [3]. The Qara Qoyunlu and Aq Qoyunlu were Turkoman (literally mentioned in their article with WP:RS), not "Azerbaijani". HistoryofIran (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars

A tag has been placed on Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Battle of Otlukbeli ‎. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars has been nominated for deletion

Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ottoman-Azerbaiijani wars

A tag has been placed on Category:Ottoman-Azerbaiijani wars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Azerbaijani-Uzbek wars

A tag has been placed on Category:Azerbaijani-Uzbek wars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are risking a block

Please see the complaint about your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Clasus1453. If you continue to edit without answering the complaint, you are risking a block for disruption. EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from article space

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are blocked from article, template and category space until such time as you arre willing to communicate and discuss your changes. Per a complaint at ANI filed on 26 February. EdJohnston (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Clasus1453. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]