User talk:Classicalecon

Hello, Classicalecon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GökHan 10:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Boolean algebra

I think your recent edit to Boolean algebra and your merge proposal for Boolean algebra (logic) and Two-element Boolean algebra are based on the misunderstanding that the latter is about a mathematical field rather than a specific mathematical structure. Therefore I have reverted them. I hope you don't mind.

We clearly have too many Boolean algebra related articles. It's not clear that the 2-element BA needs its own article, but a far better merge target would be Boolean algebra (structure) because it's actually an instance of that. --Hans Adler (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Producer surplus

Hello, your edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economic_surplus&diff=294493605&oldid=prev removed a source from university lecture notes, and replaced it with a differing, unsubstantiated statement. Could you please find a reference for your statement, or at least add "Citation needed" to encourage someone to find one. I am not an economics expert, but the source you deleted made more sense to me than the statement you added. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.123.100 (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on Talk:Economic surplus

Good evening

Hello. i'am happy to see you're existing. Don't blame me about my anger... and please, go and see the two articles (if you have time)New algebra and Vieta (Franciscus). I tried all day to find english or american referencies. I don't know if it is % successfull. You'll say it. For the New algebra, I tried to enrich the translation and ask help where I could. The matter is heavy and I fear that everybody is affraid in front of such a subject... Jean de Parthenay (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem knowledgeable in type theory-related matters

Perhaps you have some suggestions in the matter of organizing those articles in between Math an CS interests? See discussion. Pcap ping 18:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I don't know if you're aware of it or not, but there's a very informal association of WT:WikiProject Computer science-interested editors. Watchlisting that page might be good idea. Thanks, Pcap ping 18:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ad ad.

Hi
Before you start advertising the Ads on hundreds of talk pages, can you get some consensus somewhere that this is in any way useful? Lengthening the topmatter on those highly frequented pages just because should be avoided, and I don't see the usefulness of those pointers at all.
Regards, Amalthea 18:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found the ad here cute, but I suspect it can get old. Given that's hidden by default, I don't see much harm, but a poll somewhere, e.g. in one of the Wikipedia:Village_pump notice boards, is probably justified if you plan to change a lot of pages like that. It suffices for one editor to disagree with you and start reverting you all over to cause a bunch of unnecessary work... Pcap ping 19:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Amalthea 13:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

... and some of them I find corny. Pcap ping 16:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract Stone Duality

Whilst ASD was inspired by Stone duality, it is not an accurate representation of either of them to use one as a redirection for the other, especially when the one mention of ASD is in non-classical analysis.

Since ASD is original research by essentially one person (me), it would be contrary to Wikipedia policy for me to write about it, whilst no-one else is qualified to do so. So I blanked your redirection, but several busibodies have since repeatedly reverted it.

I have therefore, under protest, written a minimal article about ASD (not a stub, as I am not inviting anyone else to add to it), but I would prefer not to have any article at all.

Please reply directly by email, not via Wikipedia.

Paul Taylor (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Abstract Stone duality

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Abstract Stone duality. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract Stone duality. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Research Contact

Hi Classicalecon, I stumbled upon your editing on "Discrete probability distribution" and "Multisets". This sentence made me curious: "This is especially useful when dealing with probability distributions involving both a continuous and a discrete part". I wonder if you are interested in discussing this. You can contact me by email: astanski@cs.tu-berlin.de --Berlinadam (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAC trouble

Thanks. You are somehow the only editor who appears to act reasonably in this whole mess so far.

AfD nomination of Curly bracket programming language

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Curly bracket programming language. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curly bracket programming language. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Type systems

Given your interest in computer science, you may be interested in commenting on Talk:Strongly typed programming language#Requested_move --Cybercobra (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Defunctionalization and lambda lifting

Hi, I've seen that you proposed a merger between the two pages, but neither in the talk pages nor in the edit logs you explained why. The current "discussion", that is me and another guy, says "don't merge". Can you please comment on the relevant [Talk:Defunctionalization|talk page] (and notify me if you want on my talk page)? If you agree not to merge, could you please also remove the merge proposal? Thanks. --Blaisorblade (talk) 18:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikipedia ad exists

Template:Wikipedia ad exists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Overriding (mathematics)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Overriding (mathematics) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § Overriding (mathematics) until a consensus is reached. Tea2min (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]