User talk:ClassicEditor97

Welcome!

Hello, ClassicEditor97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 03:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greta Garbo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in which Garbo disguised herself as a man and kissed a female co-star. {Sfn|Paris|1994|pp=572–573}}{{Sfn|Swenson|1997|p=316}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trax Colton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trax Colton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trax Colton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shearonink (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand

why you consistently create articles with little or no references. You obviously know a lot about movies, television, actors from old-time Hollywood & the entertainment world in general. If the subject is notable, it shouldn't be difficult to include multiple reliable sources. Shearonink (talk) 16:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, in the article you created on The Decorator (TV pilot), you use a quote from Ed Sikov's book on Bette Davis, "Dark Victory", that made it look like Sikov was being quoted. So, obviously you read the book or were aware of the book, but you didn't include any citations, making it necessary for some other editor to go find the book, find the quote, and create a cited reference for your own quoted statement. I did all that and discovered that Sikov himself didn't say those words, it was Mart Crowley that Sikov was quoting (and Sikov even included a reference for the statement). So, not only did I have to find the reference, I had to correct the misattribution you created for the implied speaker. In the future, when you create articles, please create your own cited references, so the information can be verified by our readers (per Wikipedia policies/guidelines). Shearonink (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another unsourced edit, this time to Soap (TV series). You obviously have access to the Nielsen ratings for Soap and to the 1980s broadcast schedule information, you need to include the source/s so these assertions can be verified. Your editing is continuing to violate Wikipedia's core policy of Verifiability. Shearonink (talk) 17:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bell, Book and Candle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 15:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]