User talk:ClairelyClaire

March 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I noticed that you recently removed content from DARVO without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.

Here are the diffs: [1][2]. Generalrelative (talk) 23:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't need to be "improved" - it needs to be removed. It's incredibly politicized and biased, and displays a lot of overt bigotry toward any person of White racial origin who cares about the state of their own homelands. I fail to see any objectively constructive purpose served by this article, which seems antithetical to Wikipedia's purpose.

An article which does not inform but instead inflames with biased disinformation and rhetoric designed to divide and demonize does not belong on a neutral, objective encylopedia. ClairelyClaire (talk) 04:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at White genocide conspiracy theory, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 05:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not disruptive. Objectively sourced data from Census officials is not biased information. It is mathematically accurate and is not original research. ClairelyClaire (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy before editing further. Generalrelative (talk) 05:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is no rational reason for the removal of the content I added. I only included direct quotes and statements of objective fact. Your inability to allow anyone to call you out for this is really revealing. Thank you for proving your bigotry against the White race. ClairelyClaire (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you will be punishing me for providing factual statistical data from extremely reputable government and academic sources. ClairelyClaire (talk) 05:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

involves you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#POV_pusher_with_racist_overtones

Dronebogus (talk) 05:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 08:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain pages (White genocide conspiracy theory and DARVO) for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked site-wide

You were told your userpage was inappropriate. You returned it anyways. For that reason, as a clear violation of WP:POLEMIC, I have now blocked you site-wide. If you wish to request an unblock, use the instructions below.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayron 32 12:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]