User talk:Claidheamohmor

Hello Claidheamohmor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! – Pea ceNT 15:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

:) – PeaceNT 15:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Claidheamohmor 18:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Naruto ninja clothing

An editor has nominated Naruto ninja clothing, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto ninja clothing and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of flags

Hi, here you damaged an interwiki. Could you revert yourself please. Thulium 19:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted what appeared to be a test edit at first site, if you want to revert it back I won't stop you Claidheamohmor 19:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to Tom Jones (singer):

Your recent edit to Tom Jones (singer) (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I simply reverted the vandalism done by an IP address, however it appears the bot didn't actually do anything so I suspect it may be bugged. Claidheamohmor 19:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Face

What was wrong with my edit on face?

Its pretty obvious that celebrities have faces, information such as that does not belong on Wikipedia. Claidheamohmor 04:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I added it because it was his nickname in the show, I was planning to expand it as to why he was called face

Wikipedia articles arent the place for jokes, and I know that is what you are doing. Claidheamohmor 04:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a joke, I typed in face while looking for him and got that subject... if it could happen to me it could happen to anyone

I thought I would add him

Oh forget it -_- you didn't get in any trouble, I just reverted your edit. Claidheamohmor 04:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Claidheamohmor,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you are too new please come back in a month you look like a good canadate for Vandal Proof. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Sorry, but I just find this funny, you've been here for a few days, yet got your page vandalised 2 times. I guess it's normal for a vandal-fighter, and you're doing a very good job :). Look, I fixed your page a little bit (minor change only), so that maybe it would show up better for you. Hope you don't mind. Regards Pea ceNT 01:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've been wondering how to fix that. Claidheamohmor 02:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Witherbark Village

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Witherbark Village, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wowwiki.com/Witherbark_Village. As a copyright violation, Witherbark Village appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Witherbark Village has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Witherbark Village. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Witherbark Village, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 03:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has just been deleted. The claim you posted on the talk page - that the text couldn't be copyrighted because it came from another wiki - is incorrect; projects using wikis can and do copyright their text. For example, Wikipedia contributions are released under the GFDL license. You can recreate the article or request that it be undeleted if you can show that the other wiki releases its contents under a license compatible with the GFDL. Opabinia regalis 06:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism to Tyrannosaurus

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 01:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Golden Byakugam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non-notable...clan or other internet-group, etc

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 05:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to Defense of the Ancients - warning 1

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --- --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 08:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about Dota, not just Dota allstars, and Eul is undeniably the developer. Claidheamohmor 14:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article about dota itself. Let's go list Guinsoo, Meian, Syl-la-ble and others, and current developer is listed. Take this as last warning to your edits without proper discussion. --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 16:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original creator is Eul so he should be listed as the developer. Iceforg doesn't deserve this title since all he did was edit.

Process of creating new disambiguation pages

Hi ... Before making any more new disambiguation pages, please review WP:D—especially the code of honor and WP:DAB. One of the steps in this process is to "use the What links here list for the moved page to update all of the pages that link to that page (more likely than not, a link in Wikipedia will point to your new disambiguation page unnecessarily, and this should be resolved on a case-by-case basis)." I'm doing this for the pages that are supposed to link to the page for the baseball player named Víctor Martínez. I'll leave it to you to do the rest of the work to make the disambiguation page compliant with the guidelines. Thanks. --Sanfranman59 03:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ronnie-coleman-large.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ronnie-coleman-large.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No fair use rational on Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png is an unfree image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days (CSD I6).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)--Gavin Collins 10:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dwarven Mountain King from Warcraft III.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Anbuattackgear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anbuattackgear.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Foresttroll.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Foresttroll.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Typeagain.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Typeagain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK₀₀₄ 19:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 07:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 08:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 19:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]