Jump to content

User talk:Cl121-cw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The X-Files

[edit]

You need to stop your disruptive edits and constant reverting of edits. Episode and season counts do not get updated until it actually premieres per the instructions at Template:Infobox television. Do not add a row for season 11 in the series overview table until an episode table can be created for it, and that does not include "simply creating a table" that contains nothing but "TBA" information, per WP:TVUPCOMING and WP:TVOVERVIEW. All of this is per MOS:TV, the manual of style for writing about TV articles, which is a guideline and needs to be followed. Information also needs to be sourced (WP:V). If you make further edits that continue doing this, you may reported for disruptive behavior and ignoring of guidelines. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The X-Files shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- AlexTW 13:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and people associated with the same, all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --ChiveFungi (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]