User talk:Cléééston

Welcome!

Hello, Cléééston! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DrKay (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atenção usuários da Wikipédia

Quero uma arbitragem nesta questão. Usuário Chronus afirma que eu o insultei. Onde e quando ocorreu isso? Apenas disse que ele está promovendo uma perseguição às minhas edições e isto É VERDADE, E QUE ISTO PARECE PESSOAL, o que eu também acredito./ O usuário apagou todas minhas mensagens dirigidas a ele. Insiste em apagar minhas edições, e afirma que estou promovendo uma guerra de edições contra ele. Solicito a arbitragem de um editor sênior para confirmar suas alegações.

Usuário:SanSilva 21h20min de 7 de fevereiro de 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanSilva (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cléééston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I was accused of having multiple accounts, but no proof was ever shown to me or anyone else. No one gave me a warning that I was about o be blocked or confronted me about it; ask me if I really had multiple accounts. I was just blocked out of the blue. I never had multiple accounts. There's no proof that I had multiple accounts because that's not true. I don't know what led that admin to believe that I had multiple accounts. Besides, being block indefinitely is completely unfair. In my original Wikipedia, the portuguese Wikipedia, I was never accused of something like that and my colleagues can attet to that. know So, after more than 3 years, I formally ask for this unfair block be reviewed and lifted. What prompted me to only ask for a review now is that I have some refs that I want to pass to another user who's working on a article of my interest and I want that article to be great.

Accept reason:

You were blocked because your edits were extremely similar to the sock puppets of Guilherme Styles (talk · contribs): e.g. master sock puppet you sock puppet. DrKay (talk) 16:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ace Combat 7 Skies Unknown game cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to CD Projekt, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletion in Pelennor Fields article lead

Hi, just to let you know I was very surprised at your sudden and unexplained attempt to delete part of the lead section of this article. The lead as I would have expected you to know is a summary of the cited content in the body of the article. In this case the article is fully cited to reliable sources, and the lead is required for Good Article status to summarize all parts of the article body. I do hope this is clear. Many thanks for your understanding and cooperation, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you crop the NASA Astronaut Group 5 image?

I always like the original file better than that cropped file you did. Can you not crop that? Hawkeye and I did a good job working together. Loveheart547 (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Loveheart547: Because its far away and you can't barely see the astronauts faces. There's no reason for that image be from that far away. Cléééston (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, Cléééston. Thank you for your edit on the page The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019 video game). Unfortunately, the content you added did not have a source attached to it, so I have reverted your edit. If you want to re-add your content, please make sure to include a reliable source that verifies your edit. If you think this revert was incorrect, please don't hesitate to undo it. Thank you. Stefvanschie (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SOLRAD 4/4B

Hello, Cléééston. I see you changed the GAC field on SOLRAD 4 and SOLRAD 4B from Warfare to Physics and Astronomy. Either is fine -- the satellites carried both surveillance and scientific instruments. I chose Warfare because the military mission was primary (though the public did not know this).

Just FYI. :) --Neopeius (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill in the summary field when editing

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! — sbb (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taiho aircraft carrier image

Hello, I will do some research to figure out more about the photo. -Artanisen (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Artanisen: It's a photo of a model kit, not the real Taiho. Months ago I uploaded that same image and it was deleted. See here Cléééston (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I will request deletion of the photo. -Artanisen (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cléééston: Aren't the colorized photos of ships also copyrighted, because it has been edited a lot? -Artanisen (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Artanisen: I don't know. Other people are uploading them and keeping the watermark with the credits for the person responsible for the colorization. That's what I'm doing. None of those images have been tagged for deletion so far, so I guess there's no problem since if they had copyright, maybe they couldn't be colorized in the first place. Cléééston (talk) 00:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cléééston: Hmm, are there any higher quality photos of the Taiho, that could be used? How about this colored photo. There's more here. -Artanisen (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Artanisen: As far as my knowledge goes, there's only 2 photos of Taiho, both of which are already on Commons. The ship entered service pretty late in the war and was built in secrecy, so no photos were alowed. That was the same case for Shinano. Those photos that you shared are from the same colorist I usually go looking for images, so they are very high quality, but for Taiho you would need to crop the images and in the process lose the watermark. Cléééston (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we could crop the lower half of the photo with the watermark. There might be more photos when it sailed around. -Artanisen (talk) 04:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian ship photos

I appreciate your work on Russian battleships, but be advised that most of the photos that you've swapped out for better ones were actually in copyright or had a fair use exception. Most of the good photos for Imperial Russian photos on Commons need to be deleted because nobody can prove that they were published before 1927. Forex I looked at all of the photos of Ioann Zlatoust and only found one out of the 20+ with a publication history that confirms that it's out of copyright. I've reverted your change to the Evstafi-class battleship, but you need to do the same for the other photos that you've done recently. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nintendo Switch without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GSK (talk • edits) 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]