User talk:CitroenLover/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:CitroenLover. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Deal Or No Deal

Hello. I restored the present tense because all articles on Wikipedia about discontinued television programmes are written in that tense. It still exists in some form after new episodes cease to be made. The Wikipedia WP:TENSE states: "write all articles in the present tense, including for those covering products or works that have been discontinued". In this case though it's especially incorrect to be changing it to the past tense because new episodes are actually due to be broadcast.-Lo2u ^{(T • C)} 11:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Please see my reply to your comment on my talk page. --Lo2u ^{(T • C)} 20:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 3) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Homeworld

Since the edit summary box is pretty small it makes things seem snippy, so I wanted to talk to you directly about why I reverted your addition. I'm not saying that HW1 (classic) didn't scale in a limited way (having hard limits on scaling up/down), though the link you posted doesn't actually say that it's primarily by adding/removing resources (just that it is in the Lost Souls level). But like I was trying to say in the edit summary, the reason that we use reliable sources, not just pseudonymous forum posts, is that it proves not only that the information is accurate but that it is considered somewhat important. If no reliable source says that the scaling is minimal, then maybe it's not a super-important fact to pass on to readers of a general-purpose encyclopedia.

Also, to be blunt, it's super-rude to half-create a reference or just pick a non-reliable one to link and then claim that someone else will fix it. Frankly no, they won't, because there aren't unlimited editors on every article, so please finish your own thoughts. --Pres N 19:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:RS is kind of long; the section that specifically mentions random forum posts not being acceptable is at WP:RSSELF (link to section of WP:RS) --Pres N 19:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Citations

Please add the citations rather than merely including them in an edit summary. Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)