User talk:CitoyenSolidaire

Welcome!

Hi CitoyenSolidaire! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Kj cheetham!

Thanks for the warm welcome.

I'm going to ask a question right away!

Cheers

CitoyenSolidaire (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, CitoyenSolidaire. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Clara Egger, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. At the Teahouse you stated "This is volunteer work in order to help promote democracy in my country. I'm in a hurry because the elections are comming very soon and my candidate is a non-partisan candidate with only volunteers to support her". It is important that full declaration of connections between editors and the people they write about is made clear. Nick Moyes (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Nick Moyes I am not paid for this contribution, and am not part of the organization, which is not a party. This is volunteer work on my own to translate the French page about this candidate to English, because I find her non-partisan message is important for the quality of the upcoming debates that will take place for the French Presidency elections 1st round. In my opinion, this is not a conflict of interest. Please insist if you still think it is. Thank you. I see User:TheTechnician27 has posted suggestions to make the article more fit for en.wikipedia.org, which I intend to take into account. I insist on the fact that my article is a direct translation (as best as I could) from French to English. Thank you! CitoyenSolidaire (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Nick Moyes My intent was to provide an English translation of the French article. I thought it would be "easy", just a few hours of translation work and careful code editing. But after reviewing @User:TheTechnician27's expert comments, I realize how hard it can be to write a good article. I'm not sure whether the original French article on fr.wikipedia.org would have met these high standards if it had been submitted here in the first place. Maybe a complete rewrite is necessary? I'm grateful for your help, but I feel discouraged and useless. Best regards. CitoyenSolidaire (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi CitoyenSolidaire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I have an article approved not too late?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clara Egger (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clara Egger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clara Egger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CitoyenSolidaire! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clara Egger

Hello, CitoyenSolidaire. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clara Egger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]