User talk:Citizen Todd6

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Citizen Todd6, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Animal rights seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DoebLoggs (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Animal rights, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitely and thank you for the much helpful information on sandbox. I have Dysgraphia and my Galaxy is terrible at providing a proper spell checker.

Sincerely,

Citizen Todd6 Citizen Todd6 (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism

Hello Citizen Todd6:

Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics.

If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Animal rights

In addition to the above, also have a look at the related WikiProject – WikiProject Animal rights – and add your name to the list of participants there if you wish to collaborate. Thank you. Rasnaboy (talk) 06:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm 力. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Animal rights seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Rights or Liberation

You have recently tried to make changes on a number of articles about Animal rights and your most recent edit summary reveals a mistaken view about what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources that are verifiable WP:RS, WP:V and not any editor's point of view WP:POV. It is also not about truth WP:TRUTH but what content can be supported by those reliable sources. Maybe familiarise yourself about Wikipedia protocols before editing again. If you don't understand anything you can start at WP:5P, search view the 'Help' link in the menu on the left or I am happy to help. Please do not change content in the way you have done before before understanding Wikipedia and its protocols and processes. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all Animal Liberation has NO leader. Thus no source is credible. I am teaching Wikipedia on apparently you on a subject you know nothing about. Keep editing my corrections and we can have a discussion with Wikipedia. Understand? Citizen Todd6 (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was being helpful in my post above in informing you of Wikipedia policy. Your tone both here and the message you left on my talk page are close to contravening the collaborative and civil approach that is expected of editors contrary to WP:CIVIL. The protocols and procedures are in place in Wikipedia for good reason. If you do not want to follow them that's okay but that means NOT posting content on Wikipedia. If you want to educate people then you can by writing learned papers, books, articles and the like outside of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the place for your opinions. As to whether I know anything about this subject or not is an assumption you are making and it is irrelevant in the general scheme because information in Wikipedia is about what is supported by sources not the editors opinion even if this is based on personal experience or knowledge. Please read the links I gave above and learn what Wikipedia is and is not. You could start at WP:NOT. If you continue to edit articles as you have they are very likely to be reverted by me or by other editors because they are not following Wikipedia protocols. Continuing to make edits as you have can be seen as disruptive and being disruptive does have consequences WP:WAR, WP:DE. I am only trying to be informative and help you understand Wikipedia. If you do not want to follow Wikipedia protocols then maybe Wikipedia is not the place for you. You are welcome to discuss anything here or on an article talk page that other editors post but this must be done in a reasoned and civil manner and follow Wikipedia protocols. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. And will take a different approach on this topic. One more fitting with protocol. Instead of making edits which are not conducive. I will create new content with all the appropriate citations.

I value feedback and process it best after taking time to think on it.

Wesley Citizen Todd6 (talk) 16:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have made an update to a Detroit Techno Artist and her death. Though the date is not official it's been corroborated by credibly sources.

Kelli Hand

As for the removing of the "Living Person" citation. I am new and learning. Detroit is the City I grew up in and was apart of this Birth of a Phenomenon, Techno. I wish to keep it's Legacy maintained. Any help would be grateful.

Citizen Todd6 (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Citizen Todd6 (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not need to be the first place where the fact that a person has died is reported. Until you have a better source, you'll have to hold off. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably clarify. There's nothing particularly wrong with using mixmag.net as a source, but its death notice is too vague to be used as a BLP source for this purpose. That's the main reason I reverted. While you wait for more details to appear, you might want to learn a bit more about how to do citations and see if you can dig up more sources that can be used for the article. Currently the sourcing at Kelli Hand is pretty terrible and the article would benefit from your attentions. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha well said. So how does one get the right to remove. Alot to learn about the subculture of "wiki people." Red Flags are appearing. And one thing that bothers most as a person with a degree in corporate communications is the contradiction in your statements. Citizen Todd6 (talk) 07:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm sorry, but I believe your approach is incompatible with Wikipedia, and many (most) of your posts and edit summaries are difficult to understand. See for example Special:Diff/1141040032, Special:Diff/1135473722, Special:Diff/1015591458, Special:Diff/1015565907, Special:Diff/1015411793, Special:Diff/1015414403, Special:Diff/1014815432. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 12:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]

I accept my lack of "wiki" related editing was sloppy. And I did not take an appropriate amount of time to learn this "language of writing." I am predisposed to not understand Language.

As an Individual with Dysgraphia I have benefited by MS Word decades ago. I also unfortunately came to except "smart phones" with helping this motor skill phenomenon. However the simple ones on an Android are anything but smart.

I have attended Film School in Los Angeles under UCLA Professor's. Write papers and Screenplays for Screenwriting class. My Professor earned his PhD at Yale. Before attending I was establishing a residency at a Community College in Central California. An unbiased paper on the Death Penalty. Would become the first praise I've ever received in writing. A copy was made for the class and I was asked to read my piece aloud.

I had abandoned earning a degree in the early 90's. Yet, never stopped self-education and a dream of attending Film School in Los Angeles. The Film E.T. inspired me in 1982. Undiagnosed with Dysgraphia; which is a failure of the education system. My aptitude scores were high in cognitive thought & very high in verbal communication. This I would read along with my penmanship should have been enough to realize this. Having earned a Certification to advance twords teaching Social Science in Middle School. An introductory Educational Psychology class addressed Mother Skills.

As you may judge my flow of writing I keep a beat as any screenwriter hopes to achieve. These are the markings of the movement of a Film. This is not to be confused with tangents.

I take the very idea of Animal Rights & Animal Liberation as (2) vastly different ideologies. With the latter being ideologically "Human hands off", Right's asserts Human Dominion. I am not here nor was I as I believe asked to help. To explain reasoning & logic to some group of "elitist." Whom do not share word Meanings.

Further more the individual who banned me appears to boast about these bizarre sense of entitlement with an excessive amount of bans.

Animal Liberation is a condit to Humanity. The ease at which one inflicts pain on a Human Animal is exacerbated on non Human Animals. This is why it's tentamount to for Wikipedia to extrapolate the nature of words and choose them accordance to an Article. This is the sole reason I believe I was asked to contribute. Meet with excessive scrutinizing comments was hurtful. I have stressed I have Dysgraphia, a diagnosed learning development in writing fundamentals. Notable the Cognitive Dissonance of the duality of Mind challenging the Brain on Language, a made up form of communication. My behavior was tame considering my treatment.

This "ban" must be noted as a violation of the Disabilities Act. The prompt for the ban came with a supposed rant about Animal Liberation. I expressively noted my Dysgraphia.

I have also now acknowledged I did not learn protocol well enough, I found it very mentally challenging. I did ask for help but received what is termed in Hospitality as; (I don't want to) "I am not sure but that person knows..."

I really don't have the time to make myself available to learn Wikipedia editing at the moment. Therefore I let it go. I have actual Activision on the World Stage to concern myself with.

This letter is the result of a comma I noticed out of place. It was not following by a (space). While reading about Soviet Punk Music and it's History in the 80s. In this case a simple edit would suffice.

This was not possible because someone was allowed to ban an Individual who reached out for Help and acknowledged his Learning Disability.

To punish one based on a Learning Disability is a gross violation. Even more so when in conjunction with an Organization built on Learning. Unfortunately no amount of sophistry can undo or influence a non perceived justification. Said individual should have made sure they understand the ADA, as I do.

This will be documented.

... Or _ _ _ Or blah blah blah

Good Day

  Citizen Todd6 (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Acknowledged his learning disability"? How so? You wrote on your userpage that you have dysphagia. That's not a learning disability. I remind you that you can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. If your long post above is intended as an unblock request, I can put it into the template for you, if you like (no outside admin will see it unless it's in a template), though I doubt it will help your case. You had better read the Guide to appealing blocks first, and then write a new unblock request. Bishonen | tålk 02:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

You need to mind your manners as this wasn't an appeal per se. And the intention of the letter was in my opinion going to the appropriate forum.

Your unsolicited advice it won't matter what I say is an awfully attitude and I am sure it makes you a Hypocrit.

The learning disability is if you reread you will notice this word: Dysgraphia.

I won't be appealing. It doesn't mine as much to me as so lol and your dad.

I will address your thoughtless attitude twords an individual with a disability protected by the ADA. And a Corporation whom fosters shaming people.

Please no reply. Your rude.

Citizen Todd6 (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]