User talk:Citadelite
Human rights in Egypt
[edit]Hi Citadelite,
I know that human rights is a sensitive topic in Egypt. People often feel attacked when the subject is broached. Trust me when I tell you that in the larger scheme of things, it does not cast Egypt in a bad light. It shows that despite living under an undeniable dictatorship, the political culture is still healthy enough to be self-critical. It is not airing dirty laundry for the sake of airing dirty laundry--it comes from a place of deep concern, not only for those violated, but for the well-being of the country in general. It shows a desire to improve because it hurts more to know that these things happen than simply other people finding out about them. The fact that these violations can fill page after page after page is what really reflects badly on the country. I'd much rather show the deep concern that many people have about these events than try to sweep things under the rug like countries with much worse human rights records, but try to project an image of the "happy family"-type of fiction. I'd rather see a large section giving snippets of what really goes on than leave it up for speculation. If the articles on those countries won't even give a decent amount of coverage to the abuses that take place in their midst, then I feel sorry for them and those who made that decision. People who can't handle the truth never change, and that's why things are probably so horrible in the first place. I'm at least glad to know that Egypt cares enough about its citizens when their basic human rights are violated, and that its culture is healthy and mature enough to talk about it more openly until it stops. The other obvious thing is that human rights are universal, and that's why others have a right to know and be just as concerned.
So... that said, I wouldn't disagree that these two sections could perhaps use some trimming down by moving some of that information to the main articles on these topics. I had been thinking about that for a while. As long as the most critical details are not left out or "sanitized" for an audience, I'm sure we can work something out. Best, — Zerida 10:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, it's once again a very exciting time for Egypt; all the mabrouks in the world are in order. The country could definitely use times like these right now. What you said was a bit surreal for me because I actually thought of the movie Hina Maysara when I was writing you my last message (though I've yet to see it). I would also add Amr Adeeb to that list. Don't know if you've seen this very heated Adeeb interview with the director and cast of the film. It's really quite à propos of this discussion. As you might guess, I'm a bit more on the director's side in terms of open discussion, even though I am an Adeeb fan.
- With regard to the article, I think the main problem is the religion section, which is beginning to ramble. You might want to bring up any proposals you have on the article's discussion page so that other regular editors can weigh in as well. In the meantime, I'm going to see if I can solicit a third opinion from Wikiproject Human Rights. They might have useful suggestions of their own. Cheers, — Zerida 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
<blush> Oh gosh, I hope so ;-)
Incidentally, I don't think film ratings in Europe are as stringent as those in the US, or at least that's what I've heard. Egypt could use some more regulation in that sense and less censorship, I agree. Can't wait to see the movie myself.
Good luck with your work, I know exactly what you mean <sigh> The great thing about Wikipedia on the other hand is that there is no deadline, so feel free to take your time. — Zerida 04:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:N517266177 30554 627.jpg
[edit]Image:N517266177 30554 627.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Nile N517266177 30554 627.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Nile N517266177 30554 627.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:OmarSuleiman.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:OmarSuleiman.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XLerate (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Cairo Stadium.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cairo Stadium.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 22:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ramsesst.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Ramsesst.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 (talk to me) 20:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The file File:Cairoover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Cairoc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Cityscapes in Cairo.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
