User talk:Ciper

Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.

Click here to respond to this message!

Image tagging for Image:Initial-d-arcade-stage-4-poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Initial-d-arcade-stage-4-poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shock site dispute page

Thanks for informing me about the shock site dispute page. I signed it. Is there anything else I need to do?

Vala M 16:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As fellow shock site owners, we know a bit more about shock sites than some random troll administrator with a gripe against shock sites. Thanks for your support. Aftli 18:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping me informed. If I can do anything else, tell me! I signed where your username was. Thanks again! Zouavman Le Zouave _{(Talk to me! • O))))} 18:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shock Sites

I saw your comment about the Shock Site page needing to be expanded but no one is able to. Every bit of information that is added is repeatedly deleted by the same administrator over and over again. He originally voted to have the entire page deleted. Shock Sites like Meatspin need your help. Please sign this Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mangojuice Ciper 16:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That RfC was not created in good faith. Aftli and others have been incredibly rude to MangoJuice on the Shock Site Talk Page, so despite agreeing with you in principle, I cannot support at this time. I suggest that if you want unsourced content kept, you or somebody else remind MangoJuice that in the last AfD the community almost unanimously was fine with keeping the content despite a lack of reliable sources, so its deletion would be against consensus. – Lantoka (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mangojuice has wasted everybody's time here for months. I have every right to be rude to him, as I feel he's been rude to all of us. The article is not owned by him, and it is not a dictatorship. Popular consensus says not only that the deletion of material must stop, but that he MUST go - another administrator may keep an eye on the article if they wish, but they must maintain a neutral point of view on the subject matter. Aftli 22:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being that rude can only count against you. His civility in light of your rudeness makes people much more inclined to believe his side of the story, because he remains calm and composed while you're getting all worked up. – Lantoka (talk) 09:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfC response

It might be a good idea for you to incorporate your RfC response into the top section describing the dispute. And you should probably sign as a party rather than someone else, considering that you've been campaigning to get people involved against me. Mango juice^talk 15:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should avoid fragmenting your discussion, it just makes it less likely that anyone will notice, that was my point. As to the "campaigning," please see WP:CANVAS for behavior guidelines. I think you violated them when you left messages to users saying things like "Sites like meatspin need your help" [1]. Also, I noticed you were pretty selective in who to contact: you didn't contact, for instance, User:JzG or User:Blueaster, who weren't on the talk page trying to add sites without sources. I'm not trying to make a big deal out of your behavior, though, because the community clearly supports my general approach anyway. I'm just saying you aren't an outsider to the dispute, so you could edit the top part if you wanted to (although doing that would require you to be one of the parties). Mango juice^talk 23:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subaru TransCare

This article was prodded for deletion by another ed. (you should have been notified but apparently were not). As reviewing admin, I think the article is suitable for Wikipedia with a little work, so I replaced the deletion tag with one asking for references. It really does need them; though probably correct, and you seem to have a special interest in their cars, it needs more than your say-so. shouldn't there be reviews? Ideally, both in automotive magazines and in publications for those with special needs? I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets deleted by a regular deletion process. DGG (talk) 07:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Segalogo wizliz.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Segalogo wizliz.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 07:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:R910 400x400 large1 qf.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R910 400x400 large1 qf.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:R910 400x400 large1 qf.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:R910 400x400 large1 qf.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eisenhowermug.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Eisenhowermug.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Subaru TransCare

The article Subaru TransCare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable program: no secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danger (talk) 22:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]