User talk:Cintrianex

→ Hi, I noticed you have recently created the articles English football (Tier one), English football (Tier three) and English football league structure (simplified). Much of this information is already present at List of winners of English Premiership and predecessors, List of winners of English Football League One and predecessors and English football league system, perhaps the new articles should be merged there.
—Oldelpaso 21:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

→ In the case of the top division, I don't think listing 3rd place is necessary, as its not that much of an achievement and full tables are already present at Season in English football e.g. 1888-89 in English football, which also renders the "Participants" column redundant. Changes to the number of clubs are explained at The Football League. Therefore I think the best way forward is to add the runners-up to List of winners of English Premiership and predecessors, and add relevant "See also" links. For other divisions the promotion issue makes it less straightforward - I'll have to have a think about this. Remember to put the historically accurate name when listing teams, for example Sheffield Wednesday were known as "The Wednesday" when they first won the league.
—Oldelpaso 19:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

→ I have now merged most of English football (Tier one) into List of winners of English Premiership and predecessors, and I intend to turn the former into a redirect if there are no objections.
—Oldelpaso 11:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

→ Interesting talk page concept. I noticed your request for Lincoln City 2005/06 Squadlist (Updated) to be deleted. If you are the only contributor to an article, you can put {{db-author}} at the top of the page, and an administrator will speedily delete it shortly afterward.
—Oldelpaso 21:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 8 April - 15 April

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Liverpool F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Infoboxes

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. As a general rule, I am anti-infoboxes as they seem to me to break up the text of an article which is what I am generally there to read. However, I accept I am in a small minority on that. Therefore, my opinion is that they should be as consistent as possible, and also as short as possible - particularly in articles which do not have a great amount of text in the first place. Some of the extra fields you are adding such as place in the pyramid, promotion/relegation arrangements etc. are, in my opinion, best placed in templates at the bottom of the article (e.g. see Wessex League). I also feel that setting text sizes, either in pixels or points, within infoboxes (well anywhere on the entire internet actually) is wrong and contrary to all known accessibility guidelines. Perhaps your best bet would be to use the talk page at Template:Infobox football league or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football to try to establish some sort of consensus. - fchd 05:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football league template

To be honest you're probably better taking it directly to the Football Project talkpage to get a general consensus.... ChrisTheDude 11:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lincoln City F.C. 2004/05, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Strangerer (Talk) 19:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Lincoln City F.C. Player Sources

Template:Lincoln City F.C. Player Sources has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Gasheadsteve ^{Talk to me} 19:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wintertonrangers.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Wintertonrangers.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lincolnlogo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Lincolnlogo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lincsfa.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lincsfa.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lmoorlands.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Lmoorlands.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ncelqual.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ncelqual.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nsltiny.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nsltiny.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shcsl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shcsl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uefarc.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Uefarc.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Midlands Regional Premier

A tag has been placed on Template:Midlands Regional Premier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eng lincoln 1 0607.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eng lincoln 1 0607.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 02:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sirmatt01.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sirmatt01.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Lincoln City F.C. players

The article List of Lincoln City F.C. players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List has four players, which is about 1,000 short of its final target. Doesn't look likely to be completed any time soon, and if in the future someone wishes to recreate the article with a more complete list then as it stands this article will be of little use to them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 19:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Lincoln City F.C. players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Lincoln City F.C. players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lincoln City F.C. players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Echetus Xe 19:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]