User talk:Cindy Jutras
Hello, I'm Bri. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Acumatica have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018 - Acumatica
[edit]How do you figure this merits removal of the COI and advert tags on Acumatica? All you've done is added even more company-speak to the article. If you want to actually improve it, please find independent reliable sources about something substantive. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
How do you figure this is "company speak"? I am not with Acumatica and purposely removed any obvious self-promotion. The only links I added were references to announcements and linking to their partners. How is that "company speak" What kind of citations are you looking for Cindy Jutras ----
You do realize this is an article describing the company, right? Before I edited this I looked at other similar pages for other software companies like Acumatica and purposely modeled them. I am an independent (reliable) source - I am an industry analyst that covers all these companies. Again - give me an example of a citation you would find acceptable. ----
Cindy Jutras, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Cindy Jutras! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
Why are my edits removed?
[edit]I made a series of edits on a page about a company. I am not employed by the company. I removed self-promoting pieces and marketing-speak. I have done editing twice and both times, Brit reverted back to the page before my edits. I have not violated any copyrights and I have no bias. The implication is I can't add something about the company, but this is a page DESCRIBING the company.