User talk:Cindlevet

Reply

Welcome and thanks for the message. The previous incarnations of this article basically had no sources of any kind and no useful content. I see that you have less than 100 edits and haven't created a proper article from scratch before, just AFDs and redirects. What I suggest is that you write the article as a draft at Draft:Michelle Mylett, which is best practice anyway, and let me know when it is ready. I can then unprotect the article title so that you can move it there, assuming it meets our criteria.

You might want to look at Kate Winslet for ideas on structuring, although you don't have to aspire to the level of detail in that current FAC candidate. If you have any questions or need help, please feel free to ask me.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply Jimfbleak. I've decided against this course of action because I want the article up straight away, and don't see why it should have extra scrutiny because of the mistakes of others. I'm sure another user will create the article in the short to medium term (after as I've already said there is plenty of evidence that she passes GNG. Obviously I may change my mind, but I don't want to waste my time on something that might not get approval when I could create (and will) create articles that go straight into the mainspace, but thanks for your advice and help Cindlevet (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]