User talk:Cimenterie

Welcome!

Hello, Cimenterie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:IBISA.Network, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IBISA.Network

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IBISA.Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Cimenterie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:IBISA.Network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 02:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cimenterie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Cimenterie (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a clear conflict of interest in that subject area. If your only goal here is to promote crop microinsurance, you won't be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear editors,

Thank you for your feedback. It has been a great experience. I suggest that you unblock me and I'll do an article "Crop microinsurance" and link it to the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microinsurance

In this new article, I'll post what was in the section "Principes" of my initial article. I'll edit out ALL mention about IBISA.

Hope it's fine. Best Cimenterie (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--

Hello,

I left IBISA since 2020. My new center of interest is now: https://kvutien-yes.medium.com/machu-picchu-white-paper-af58afb6efad The whole thing was a misunderstand due to my inexperience in wikipedia. Do you mind unblock me? Thanks a lot.

Cimenterie (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood...

Dear editors,

I take note of your reasons. I respect your observation. You observe that I "promote crop micro-insurance".

IMHO I did not manage to make myself clear. Our misunderstanding is my responsibility. Lack of protection of revenues of smallholder farmers is a recurrent pain that is well documented. Crop micro insurance is a solution that doesn't work, as show several published scientific studies in my post

This being said, I'll not abuse of your time. Thank you. Best.

Cimenterie (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why it took you two and a half years to respond to the above comments- and I only saw this by chance in the recent changes- but thanks. If you don't wish to edit, there is nothing more to do here. If you do wish to edit, please make another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

> I'm not sure why it took you two and a half years to respond to the above comments-

Well, to be honest, I'm a beginner in wikipedia so it's a bit daunting to fiddle with these contribution tools and policies. This is why I gave up when I saw that I'm blocked. I'm always a fan of wikipedia but if my contribution doesn't match the spirit, I accept the fact and I remain a simple consumer.

Today, I wanted to contribute to change a broken link in another wikipedia article. It reminds me that I'm blocked so I tried to unblock the account.

> If you do wish to edit, please make another unblock request.

I'm not sure I know how to do it, so I just edit this talk page, just in case. Cimenterie (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cimenterie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked apparently because I was considered as spamming account. To be honest, I was doing my first steps in wikipedia and being blocked is a bit daunting so I kept quiet for 2 years. I left IBISA.network since 2020 so the reason for blocking my account is no more relevant. Hope my next contributions will be less severely judged. Best. Cimenterie (talk) 14:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Hi Cimenterie, am procedurally declining this request as it has sat here unanswered for a while now. If you return to Wikipedia and wish to revive this unblock appeal, feel free to file a new request which responds to the points below. All the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, and thanks for this further unblock request. A couple of things need to be cleared up before it can be considered further:

First: even if you have left your former employer and are no longer employed to promote crop microinsurance you continue to have a conflict of interest with this and any related topic, and should not edit them on Wikipedia. You will need to agree to a topic ban from those topics. You will also need to indicate that you understand the conflict of interest policy. Presumably you are now employed somewhere else and if so you cannot edit any topic related to your new employer either. To help resolve this request please indicate if you have read the COI policy and perhaps summarise its key points so it is clear you have understood it.
Second, your earlier edits suggest this was a "role account" operated by multiple people. If so this is not permitted either. The requirement is one account per person. Please indicate if you accept this requirement.
Third, a condition of any unblock is permission from the blocking administrator, who I have pinged in the above template. This is because the blocking administrator may be aware of other reasons for the block besides those evident in your edit history (eg. abusing multiple accounts). If the blocking administrator declines to give approval there is no real prospect of an unblock proceeding.
Fourth, if possible can you give an indication of the areas you would like to edit in if unblocked. This will help show that an unblock would lead to productive contributions.

I appreciate this seems like a long list of conditions. This is because Wikipedia takes a strong view against promotional editing, and unblocks in this space are rare. If you don't agree to these conditions that fine, and all the ebst for wherever your interests take you other than Wikipedia. -- Euryalus (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus: Thanks for the ping, I'll remain uninvolved. – Athaenara ✉ 17:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Cimenterie, appreciate it has bene a while but if you return to this page please consider and respond to the points listed above. If no response is received after a while the request will probably be procedurally declined, but feel free to open a new one if you subsequently want to return to editing. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]