User talk:Cierrajadell
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
from: ChamithN
Teo
[edit]Hey Cierra, I'm going to remove your message from my user page, since it belongs on my user:talk page. anyway, if you go to Sneha's user page (not talk), you can click the little heart on the upper right side and send some wikiLove. :) Poetries (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]
Hey Cierra! Thanks for saying hi, and I'm glad you're excited about editing Wikipedia. Here's some kimchi for you!
When you write on talk page, remember to always sign off with your name with four tildes (~~~~) so it's easy for people to see who wrote the message when. Don't worry though, a bot came by and signed your name for you this time around. :) Let me know if you have any questions! SnehaNar (talk) 21:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]There are two issues - one is establishing notability, the other is finding adequate sources. In terms of notability, can has the restaurant been covered by sources that are independent of it? Reviews would be appropriate, but they need to come from sources that are themselves notable. A major newspaper would be a great source; a campus newspaper might be OK; a local free publication might be OK; a local blog that does restaurant reviews might not be a good enough source. A few top-notch sources would be better than a whole lot of iffy sources at establishing notability, but if you can't get quality, then quantity says something about notability.
So that's the first problem - establishing notability. If you're confident that the restaurant is notable, then comes the problem of sourcing content. For uncontroversial information, or information you could use the restaurant's website as a source. Opening hours. The type of food it serves. Who owns it. Ideally you'd get that sort of information from reviews, but sometimes there's relevant information that you can't find elsewhere, and the restaurant itself is a better source than a blog by someone unknown. Just be clear that you're reporting what they say about themselves.
The most problematic source, from a Wikipedia standpoint, is actually in-person reporting. You can go and take pictures. That's great. But reporting your own observations isn't. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Excited to work together
[edit]Hi, Cierra! Excited to work together with our group on the Oceanique article! Didn't know you love languages--so do I! I speak Italian, Spanish (probably out of practice compared to you if you're taking classes these days), French, and used to be pretty proficient in Mandarin. Aciurcina (talk) 07:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Mark Grosz.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Mark Grosz.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Class Today
[edit]Hey Cierra, I'm feeling a bit under the weather and don't think I'm going to make it to class today. Would you let the rest of the team know? :( I'll still be online on Wikipedia working on the page, formatting citations. After all Wikipedia is all about distributed collaboration. Shoot me an email if something comes up. asduner (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Mark Grosz.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Mark Grosz.png, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 30 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 02:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Oceanique Bar.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Oceanique Bar.png, which you've attributed to Renee Andre. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
